Trial reportCancer science2013
Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0805).
Trial report in Cancer science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and S-1 for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
A Study of S-1 in Combination With Gemcitabine as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Chemotherapies for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- The Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Correlations of survival with progression-free survival, response rate, and disease control rate in advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy.British journal of cancer · 2016Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-based chemotherapies in biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Influence of major hepatectomy on gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for recurrent biliary tract cancer after surgery: a subgroup analysis of JCOG1113.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Multicentre, phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: TG1308 study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2020Trial
- Efficacy and safety of trametinib in Japanese patients with advanced biliary tract cancers refractory to gemcitabine.Cancer science · 2018Trial
- Randomized Phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG1113, FUGA-BT).Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2016Trial
- Concurrent radiotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin versus concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a pilot randomised controlled trial.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2016Trial
- Treatment outcomes of chemotherapy between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Trial
- Effect of preoperative body composition on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing distal cholangiocarcinoma resection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-Hole Self-Expandable Metallic Stent for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pathological Complete Response after Pembrolizumab Treatment for Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma with High Microsatellite Instability: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Outcome of Multidisciplinary Treatment in Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.World journal of oncology · 2024Article
- Inside stent placement is suitable for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The oral fluoropyrimidine, S-1, combined with or without gemcitabine is considered to be a promising agent for treating advanced biliary tract cancer; gemcitabine plus cisplatin is the current standard regimen. This randomized phase II trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two regimens: gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) (gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m(2) , day 1 and day 8; S-1: 60 mg/m(2) , twice daily on days 1-14, repeated every 3 weeks); and S-1 (80 mg/m(2) , days 1-28, given orally twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest, repeated every 6 weeks). The regimen with a higher 1-year survival would be selected for a subsequent phase III trial. Between February 2009 and April 2010, 101 patients were randomized. For the GS (n = 51) and S-1 (n = 50) arms, the 1-year survival was 52.9% (95% confidence interval, 38.5-65.5) and 40.0% (95% confidence interval, 26.5-53.1), and the median survival times were 12.5 and 9.0 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were more frequent in the GS arm (leucocytes 29.4%, neutrophils 60.8%, hemoglobin 11.8%, platelets 11.8%) than in the S-1 arm (leucocytes 2.0%, neutrophils 4.0%, hemoglobin 4.0%, platelets 4.0%). Although two treatment-related deaths occurred in the GS arm, all other grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were reversible. In conclusion, GS was considered to be more promising and was selected as the test regimen for a subsequent phase III trial comparing GS with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy. This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN 000001685 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.