Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23762628›Full record

ArticleISRN surgery2013

Evaluation of ECHO PS Positioning System in a Porcine Model of Simulated Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair.

Erin M Hanna, Guy R Voeller, J Scott Roth, Jeffrey R Scott, Darcy H Gagne, David A Iannitti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISRN surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02233569 (COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT CONCEPTS OF MESH AND FIXATION TECHNIQUE IN THE LAPAROSCOPIC OPERATIONS FOR VENTRAL AND INCISIONAL HERNIA - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED MONOCENTER TRIAL.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02233569 naterminatednot on this map

Comparison of two different concepts of mesh and fixation technique in the laparoscopic operations for ventral and incisional hernia - a randomized controlled monocenter trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPolish Hernia Study GroupRan2012 to 2014Enrolled50ConditionsHernia, Abdominal, Hernia,VentralArmsIntraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair with the use of Phisiomesh implant and Securestrap fixation device., Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair with the use of Ventralight ST implant with SorbaFix fixation device., Ventralight ST implant, ETHICON PHYSIOMESH®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erin M HannaDepartment of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 28270, USA.
Guy R Voeller
J Scott Roth
Jeffrey R Scott
Darcy H Gagne
David A Iannitti
Brown University · USCarolinas Medical Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose. Operative efficiency improvements for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) have focused on reducing operative time while maintaining overall repair efficacy. Our objective was to evaluate procedure time and positioning accuracy of an inflatable mesh positioning device (Echo PS Positioning System), as compared to a standard transfascial suture technique, using a porcine model of simulated LVHR. Methods. The study population consisted of seventeen general surgeons (n = 17) that performed simulated LVHR on seventeen (n = 17) female Yorkshire pigs using two implantation techniques: (1) Ventralight ST Mesh + Echo PS Positioning System (Echo PS) and (2) Ventralight ST Mesh + transfascial sutures (TSs). Procedure time and mesh centering accuracy overtop of a simulated surgical defect were evaluated. Results. Echo PS demonstrated a 38.9% reduction in the overall procedure time, as compared to TS. During mesh preparation and positioning, Echo PS demonstrated a 60.5% reduction in procedure time (P < 0.0001). Although a trend toward improved centering accuracy was observed for Echo PS (16.2%), this was not significantly different than TS. Conclusions. Echo PS demonstrated a significant reduction in overall simulated LVHR procedure time, particularly during mesh preparation/positioning. These operative time savings may translate into reduced operating room costs and improved surgeon/operating room efficiency.

Identifiers

PMID23762628
PMCPMC3676964
OpenAlexW2156750027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.