ArticleEcology and evolution2013
Interpretations arising from Wrightian and Malthusian fitness under strong frequency dependent selection.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bet-hedging via Kelly betting in a limited environment leads to logistic growth in the Game of Fitness.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The general version of Hamilton's rule.eLife · 2025Article
- Article
- Fluctuating selection facilitates the discovery of broadly effective but difficult to reach adaptive outcomes in yeast.Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Modeling the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 under non-pharmaceutical interventions and testing.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2022Article
- The genotype-phenotype landscape of an allosteric protein.Molecular systems biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Can Hamilton's rule be violated?eLife · 2018Article
- Effects of demographic stochasticity and life-history strategies on times and probabilities to fixation.Heredity · 2018Article
- Feedback between environment and traits under selection in a seasonal environment: consequences for experimental evolution.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018Article
- On selection in finite populations.Journal of mathematical biology · 2018Article
- Article
- Extrapolating weak selection in evolutionary games.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fitness is the central concept in evolutionary theory. It measures a phenotype's ability to survive and reproduce. There are different ways to represent this measure: Malthusian fitness and Wrightian fitness. One can go back and forth between the two, but when we characterize model properties or interpret data, it can be important to distinguish between them. Here, we discuss a recent experiment to show how the interpretation changes if an alternative definition is used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.