Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23762458›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Motivational disturbances and effects of L-dopa administration in neurofibromatosis-1 model mice.

David F Wozniak, Kelly A Diggs-Andrews, Sara Conyers, Carla M Yuede, Joshua T Dearborn, Jacquelyn A Brown, Kazuhiro Tokuda, Yukitoshi Izumi, Charles F Zorumski, David H Gutmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pimavanserin, a 5HTJournal of neurochemistry · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Characterization of early communicative behavior in mouse models of neurofibromatosis type 1.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David F WozniakDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America. wozniakd@psychiatry.wustl.edu
Kelly A Diggs-Andrews
Sara Conyers
Carla M Yuede
Joshua T Dearborn
Jacquelyn A Brown
Kazuhiro Tokuda
Yukitoshi Izumi
Charles F Zorumski
David H Gutmann
Washington University in St. Louis · USTaylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric ResearchMissouri Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Translational NeuroscienceP30NS057105 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOLTZMAN, DAVID M. · 2006 to 2011
$8.7M
Targeting Stoma-Tumor Co-Dependency for Glioma TherapyU01CA141549 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GUTMANN, DAVID H · 2009 to 2013
$4.8M
Washington University Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP30HD062171 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI INDER, TERRIE E · 2010 to 2014
$4.3M
MODULATION OF HIPPOCAMPAL SYNAPTIC PLASTICITYR01MH077791 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZORUMSKI, CHARLES F · 2007 to 2013
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA141549NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD062171NIMH NIH HHS MH077791NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077791NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) frequently have cognitive and behavioral deficits. Some of these deficits have been successfully modeled in Nf1 genetically-engineered mice that develop optic gliomas (Nf1 OPG mice). In the current study, we show that abnormal motivational influences affect the behavior of Nf1 OPG mice, particularly with regard to their response to novel environmental stimuli. For example, Nf1 OPG mice made fewer spontaneous alternations in a Y-maze and fewer arm entries relative to WT controls. However, analysis of normalized alternation data demonstrated that these differences were not due to a spatial working memory deficit. Other reported behavioral results (e.g., open-field test, below) suggest that differential responses to novelty and/or other motivational influences may be more important determinants of these kinds of behavior than simple differences in locomotor activity/spontaneous movements. Importantly, normal long-term depression was observed in hippocampal slices from Nf1 OPG mice. Results from elevated plus maze testing showed that differences in exploratory activity between Nf1 OPG and WT control mice may be dependent on the environmental context (e.g., threatening or non-threatening) under which exploration is being measured. Nf1 OPG mice also exhibited decreased exploratory hole poking in a novel holeboard and showed abnormal olfactory preferences, although L-dopa (50 mg/kg) administration resolved the abnormal olfactory preference behaviors. Nf1 OPG mice displayed an attenuated response to a novel open field in terms of decreased ambulatory activity and rearing but only during the first 10 min of the session. Importantly, Nf1 OPG mice demonstrated investigative rearing deficits with regard to a novel hanging object suspended on one side of the field which were not rescued by L-dopa administration. Collectively, our results provide new data important for evaluating therapeutic treatments aimed at ameliorating NF1-associated cognitive/behavioral deficits.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDepressionDopamine AgentsElectrophysiologyFemaleHumansIntegrasesLevodopaMaleMaze LearningMemory DisordersMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicCre recombinaseDopamine AgentsIntegrasesLevodopaNeurofibromin 1

Identifiers

PMID23762458
PMCPMC3677926
OpenAlexW2117411297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.