Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23762403›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Age at menarche and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Chun-Yan Li, Bo Song, Ying-Yan Wang, Hua Meng, Shi-Bin Guo, Li-Na Liu, Hai-Chen Lv, Qi-Jun Wu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hormonal and reproductive factors and reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2020
    Observational
  6. Female hormones and the risk of colorectal neoplasm.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2019
    Article
  7. Age at menarche and risk of colorectal adenoma.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chun-Yan LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. Lichunyan_dl@163.com
Bo Song
Ying-Yan Wang
Hua Meng
Shi-Bin Guo
Li-Na Liu
Hai-Chen Lv
Qi-Jun Wu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious observational studies have focused on the relationship between menarcheal age and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association is still controversial because of inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess this issue from epidemiological studies.

methodsAfter a literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies of menarcheal age and CRC risk published through the end of January 2013, we pooled the relative risks (RRs) from included studies using a fixed- or random-effects model and performed heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsEleven case-control and 11 cohort studies were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The random-effects pooled RR for oldest versus youngest menarcheal age was 0.95 [95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.85-1.06], with significant heterogeneity (Q = 61.03, P<0.001, I (2) = 65.6%). When separately analyzed, case-control (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.75-1.21) and cohort studies (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.04) yielded similar results. Moreover, similar results were also observed among the subgroup analyses by study quality, population, exposure assessment, anatomic cancer site, subsite of colon cancer, and several potential important confounders and risk factors. There was no evidence of publication bias and significant heterogeneity between subgroups detected by meta-regression analyses.

conclusionsFindings from this meta-analysis demonstrated that menarcheal age was not associated with the risk of CRC in humans. Further studies are warranted to stratify results by the subsite of colon cancer and menopause status in the future.

Indexed as

Age FactorsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDatabases, BibliographicFemaleHumansMenarcheRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23762403
PMCPMC3675201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.