Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23762266›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Enteral nutrition within 48 hours of admission improves clinical outcomes of acute pancreatitis by reducing complications: a meta-analysis.

Jie-Yao Li, Tao Yu, Guang-Cheng Chen, Yu-Hong Yuan, Wa Zhong, Li-Na Zhao, Qi-Kui Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04168801 (Non-inferiority Comparative Clinical Trial Between Early Oral Refeeding Versus Usual Oral Refeeding in Mild Acute Pancreatitis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04168801 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Non-inferiority Comparative Clinical Trial Between Early Oral Refeeding Versus Usual Oral Refeeding in Mild Acute Pancreatitis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del BajioRan2018 to 2019Enrolled124ConditionsPancreatitisArmsearly oral refeeding
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical Practice Guideline—Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Early enteral nutrition in critically-ill patients.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie-Yao LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Tao Yu
Guang-Cheng Chen
Yu-Hong Yuan
Wa Zhong
Li-Na Zhao
Qi-Kui Chen
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteral nutrition is increasingly advocated in the treatment of acute pancreatitis, but its timing is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to find out the feasibility of early enteral nutrition within 48 hours of admission and its possible advantages. METHODS AND

findingsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE Databases, Web of Science, the Cochrane library, and scholar.google.com for all the relevant articles about the effect of enteral nutrition initiated within 48 hours of admission on the clinical outcomes of acute pancreatitis from inception to December 2012. Eleven studies containing 775 patients with acute pancreatitis were analyzed. Results from a pooled analysis of all the studies demonstrated that early enteral nutrition was associated with significant reductions in all the infections as a whole (OR 0.38; 95%CI 0.21-0.68, P<0.05), in catheter-related septic complications (OR 0.26; 95%CI 0.11-0.58, P<0.05), in pancreatic infection (OR 0.49; 95%CI 0.31-0.78, P<0.05), in hyperglycemia (OR 0.24; 95%CI 0.11-0.52, P<0.05), in the length of hospitalization (mean difference -2.18; 95%CI -3.48-(-0.87); P<0.05), and in mortality (OR 0.31; 95%CI 0.14-0.71, P<0.05), but no difference was found in pulmonary complications (P>0.05). The stratified analysis based on the severity of disease revealed that, even in predicted severe or severe acute pancreatitis patients, early enteral nutrition still showed a protective power against all the infection complications as a whole, catheter-related septic complications, pancreatic infection complications, and organ failure that was only reported in the severe attack of the disease (all P<0.05).

conclusionEnteral nutrition within 48 hours of admission is feasible and improves the clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis as well as in predicted severe or severe acute pancreatitis by reducing complications.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionDatabases, BibliographicHumansLength of StayPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingPostoperative ComplicationsSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23762266
PMCPMC3675100
OpenAlexW2055157740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.