ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013
Queuing of concurrent movement plans by basal ganglia.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Compression of time in double-step saccades.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Basis of movement control in dystonia and why botulinum toxin should influence it?Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2024Article
- Preservation of Eye Movements in Parkinson's Disease Is Stimulus- and Task-Specific.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- An informal logic of feedback-based temporal control.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neural mechanisms underlying the temporal control of sequential saccade planning in the frontal eye field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- How Beat Perception Co-opts Motor Neurophysiology.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021Review
- The programming of sequences of saccades.Experimental brain research · 2019Review
- Decision-making in sensorimotor control.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2018Review
- Basal ganglia mechanisms in action selection, plasticity, and dystonia.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2018Review
- Article
- The Concurrent Programming of Saccades.PloS one · 2016Article
- Hedging your bets: intermediate movements as optimal behavior in the context of an incomplete decision.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- The Monitoring and Control of Task Sequences in Human and Non-Human Primates.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Review
- Where attention falls: Increased risk of falls from the converging impact of cortical cholinergic and midbrain dopamine loss on striatal function.Experimental neurology · 2014Review
- Modeling fall propensity in Parkinson's disease: deficits in the attentional control of complex movements in rats with cortical-cholinergic and striatal-dopaminergic deafferentation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How the brain converts parallel representations of movement goals into sequential movements is not known. We tested the role of basal ganglia (BG) in the temporal control of movement sequences by a convergent approach involving inactivation of the BG by muscimol injections into the caudate nucleus of monkeys and assessing behavior of Parkinson's disease patients, performing a modified double-step saccade task. We tested a critical prediction of a class of competitive queuing models that explains serial behavior as the outcome of a selection of concurrently activated goals. In congruence with these models, we found that inactivation or impairment of the BG unmasked the parallel nature of goal representations such that a significantly greater extent of averaged saccades, curved saccades, and saccade sequence errors were observed. These results suggest that the BG perform a form of competitive queuing, holding the second movement plan in abeyance while the first movement is being executed, allowing the proper temporal control of movement sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.