ArticleFrontiers in genetics2013
Pre-mRNA processing factors meet the DNA damage response.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large-scale CRISPR screening in primary human 3D gastric organoids enables comprehensive dissection of gene-drug interactions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The NONO protein regulates nonclassical DNA structure: Effects on circadian genes and DNA damage.iScience · 2025Article
- RNA helicase D1PAS1 resolves R-loops and forms a complex for mouse pachytene piRNA biogenesis required for male fertility.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Interaction between lncRNAs and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) influences DNA damage response in cancer chemoresistance.Molecular biology reports · 2024Review
- Review
- A dual role of RBM42 in modulating splicing and translation of CDKN1A/p21 during DNA damage response.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Recruitment of RBM6 to DNA Double-Strand Breaks Fosters Homologous Recombination Repair.Molecular and cellular biology · 2023Article
- A rare human centenarian variant of SIRT6 enhances genome stability and interaction with Lamin A.The EMBO journal · 2022Article
- DNA Damage Regulates the Functions of the RNA Binding Protein Sam68 through ATM-Dependent Phosphorylation.Cancers · 2022Article
- Good Cop, Bad Cop: The Different Roles of SRPKs.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- RBM6 splicing factor promotes homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks and modulates sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Article
- The splicing factor XAB2 interacts with ERCC1-XPF and XPG for R-loop processing.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Chemotherapeutic drugs: Cell death- and resistance-related signaling pathways. Are they really as smart as the tumor cells?Translational oncology · 2021Review
- Co-Expression Network Analysis of Spleen Transcriptome in Rock Bream (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Connections between 3' end processing and DNA damage response: Ten years later.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2020Review
- Investigation on Potential Correlation Between Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Polypeptide A and Lung Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- From "Cellular" RNA to "Smart" RNA: Multiple Roles of RNA in Genome Stability and Beyond.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well-known that DNA-damaging agents induce genome instability, but only recently have we begun to appreciate that chromosomes are fragile per se and frequently subject to DNA breakage. DNA replication further magnifies such fragility, because it leads to accumulation of single-stranded DNA. Recent findings suggest that chromosome fragility is similarly increased during transcription. Transcripts produced by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) are subject to multiple processing steps, including maturation of 5' and 3' ends and splicing, followed by transport to the cytoplasm. RNA maturation starts on nascent transcripts and is mediated by a number of diverse proteins and ribonucleoprotein particles some of which are recruited cotranscriptionally through interactions with the carboxy-terminal domain of RNAPII. This coupling is thought to maximize efficiency of pre-mRNA maturation and directly impacts the choice of alternative splice sites. Mounting evidence suggests that lack of coordination among different RNA maturation steps, by perturbing the interaction of nascent transcripts with the DNA template, has deleterious effects on genome stability. Thus, in the absence of proper surveillance mechanisms, transcription could be a major source of DNA damage in cancer. Recent high-throughput screenings in human cells and budding yeast have identified several factors implicated in RNA metabolism that are targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases: ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ATM-Rad3 related) (Tel1 and Mec1 in budding yeast, respectively). Moreover, inactivation of various RNA processing factors induces accumulation of γH2AX foci, an early sign of DNA damage. Thus, a complex network is emerging that links DNA repair and RNA metabolism. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview of the role played by pre-mRNA processing factors in the cell response to DNA damage and in the maintenance of genome stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.