The influence of prism adaptation on perceptual and motor components of neglect: a reply to saevarsson and kristjansson.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Prism adaptation speeds reach initiation in the direction of the prism after-effect.Experimental brain research · 2017
   Article
2. Modelling the differential effects of prisms on perception and action in neglect.Experimental brain research · 2015
   Article
3. Introduction to the research topic novel insights in rehabilitation of neglect.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014
   Article
4. Neglected premotor neglect.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014
   Article
5. Prism adaptation theory in unilateral neglect: motor and perceptual components.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013
   Article
6. Prism adaptation does not alter configural processing of faces.F1000Research · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.