ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2013
High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Choosing between bad and worse: investigating choice in moral dilemmas through the lens of control.Cognitive processing · 2025Article
- Beyond Trolleyology: The CNI Model of Moral-Dilemma Responses.Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2025Review
- Would you? Effects of oxytocin on moral choices in forensic psychopathic patients.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2024Article
- Article
- The Effects of Intent, Outcome, and Causality on Moral Judgments and Decision Processes.Psychologica Belgica · 2022Article
- Neural responses to morally laden interactions in female inmates with psychopathy.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Article
- Somatic Marker Production Deficits do not Explain the Relationship between Psychopathic Traits and Utilitarian Moral Decision Making.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- The Empathic Brain of Psychopaths: From Social Science to Neuroscience in Empathy.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
- Alcohol, empathy, and morality: acute effects of alcohol consumption on affective empathy and moral decision-making.Psychopharmacology · 2019Article
- To Brake or Not to Brake? Personality Traits Predict Decision-Making in an Accident Situation.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Cognitive-Emotional and Inhibitory Deficits as a Window to Moral Decision-Making Difficulties Related to Exposure to Violence.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- The neuroscience of morality and social decision-making.Psychology, crime & law : PC & L · 2018Article
- Neural Correlates of Moral Evaluation and Psychopathic Traits in Male Multi-Problem Young Adults.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
- Simulating Moral Actions: An Investigation of Personal Force in Virtual Moral Dilemmas.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Daytime REM sleep affects emotional experience but not decision choices in moral dilemmas.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Behavioral and autonomic reactivity to moral dilemmas in frontotemporal dementia versus Alzheimer's disease.Social neuroscience · 2017Article
- Functional connectivity in incarcerated male adolescents with psychopathic traits.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2017Article
- A Behavioral Measure of Costly Helping: Replicating and Extending the Association with Callous Unemotional Traits in Male Adolescents.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychopathy is a personality disorder frequently associated with immoral behaviors. Previous behavioral studies on the influence of psychopathy on moral decision have yielded contradictory results, possibly because they focused either on judgment (abstract evaluation) or on choice of hypothetical action, two processes that may rely on different mechanisms. In this study, we explored the influence of the level of psychopathic traits on judgment and choice of hypothetical action during moral dilemma evaluation. A population of 102 students completed a questionnaire with ten moral dilemmas and nine non-moral dilemmas. The task included questions targeting both judgment ("Is it acceptable to … in order to …?") and choice of hypothetical action ("Would you … in order to …?"). The level of psychopathic traits of each participant was evaluated with the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) scale. Logistic regression fitted with the generalized estimating equations method analyses were conducted using responses to the judgment and choice tasks as the dependent variables and psychopathy scores as predictor. Results show that a high level of psychopathic traits, and more specifically those related to affective deficit, predicted a greater proportion of utilitarian responses for the choice but not for the judgment question. There was no first-order interaction between the level of psychopathic traits and other potential predictors. The relation between a high level of psychopathic traits and increased utilitarianism in choice of action but not in moral judgment may explain the contradictory results of previous studies where these two processes were not contrasted. It also gives further support to the hypothesis that choice of action endorsement and abstract judgment during moral dilemma evaluation are partially distinct neural and psychological processes. We propose that this distinction should be better taken into account in the evaluation of psychopathic behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.