Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23761701›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013

Modulation of central gustatory coding by temperature.

David M Wilson, Christian H Lemon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stimulus temperature modulates the psychophysical dimensions of salt taste.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Temperature effects on taste preferences are influenced by TRPM8.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Separation of Oral Cooling and Warming Requires TRPM8.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cortical Hub for Flavor Sensation in Rodents.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Central taste anatomy and physiology.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2019
    Review
  15. Modulation of taste processing by temperature.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David M WilsonDepartment of Pharmacological and Physiological Science, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Christian H Lemon
Saint Louis University · US

Funding

Taste and Somatosensory ProcessingR01DC011579 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI CHRISTIAN H LEMON · 2011 to 2026
$4.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-011579NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011579NIGMS NIH HHS GM-008306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in oral temperature can influence taste perception, indicating overlap among mechanisms for taste and oral somesthesis. Medullary gustatory neurons can show cosensitivity to temperature, albeit how these cells process combined taste and thermal input is poorly understood. Here, we electrophysiologically recorded orosensory responses (spikes) from 39 taste-sensitive neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarii of anesthetized mice during oral delivery of tastants adjusted to innocuous cool (16 and 18°C), room (22°C, baseline), and warm (30 and 37°C) oral temperatures. Stimuli included (in mM) 100 sucrose, 30 NaCl, 3 HCl, 3 quinine, an umami mixture, and water. Although cooled water excited few cells, water warmed to 30 and 37°C significantly excited 33% and 64% of neurons, respectively. Warmth induced responses of comparable magnitude to room temperature tastants. Furthermore, warming taste solutions influenced the distribution of gustatory responses among neurons and increased (P < 0.05) neuronal breadth of tuning across taste qualities. The influence of warmth on response magnitude was stimulus specific. Across neurons, warming facilitated responses to sucrose and umami in a superadditive manner, as these responses exceeded (P < 0.05) the arithmetic sum of activity to warming alone and the taste stimulus tested at room temperature. Superadditive increases (P < 0.05) in responding were also noted in some cells for warmed HCl. Yet warming induced only simple additive or subtractive effects on responses to quinine and NaCl. Data show temperature is a parameter of gustatory processing, like taste quality and concentration, in medullary circuits for taste.

Indexed as

Body TemperatureAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C3HNeuronsSolitary NucleusTastemultimodalneural codingnucleus of the solitary tracttastetemperature

Identifiers

PMID23761701
PMCPMC3763089
OpenAlexW2148154012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.