Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23761696›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013

Effects of spectral and temporal disruption on cortical encoding of gerbil vocalizations.

Maria Ter-Mikaelian, Malcolm N Semple, Dan H Sanes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Seasonal plasticity of precise spike timing in the avian auditory system.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural processing of natural sounds.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Ter-MikaelianCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Malcolm N Semple
Dan H Sanes
New York University · US

Funding

Influence of moderate hearing loss on auditory perception & cortical processingR01DC009237 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, DAN HARVEY · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-009237NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal communication sounds contain spectrotemporal fluctuations that provide powerful cues for detection and discrimination. Human perception of speech is influenced both by spectral and temporal acoustic features but is most critically dependent on envelope information. To investigate the neural coding principles underlying the perception of communication sounds, we explored the effect of disrupting the spectral or temporal content of five different gerbil call types on neural responses in the awake gerbil's primary auditory cortex (AI). The vocalizations were impoverished spectrally by reduction to 4 or 16 channels of band-passed noise. For this acoustic manipulation, an average firing rate of the neuron did not carry sufficient information to distinguish between call types. In contrast, the discharge patterns of individual AI neurons reliably categorized vocalizations composed of only four spectral bands with the appropriate natural token. The pooled responses of small populations of AI cells classified spectrally disrupted and natural calls with an accuracy that paralleled human performance on an analogous speech task. To assess whether discharge pattern was robust to temporal perturbations of an individual call, vocalizations were disrupted by time-reversing segments of variable duration. For this acoustic manipulation, cortical neurons were relatively insensitive to short reversal lengths. Consistent with human perception of speech, these results indicate that the stable representation of communication sounds in AI is more dependent on sensitivity to slow temporal envelopes than on spectral detail.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexFemaleGerbillinaeMaleNeuronsSound SpectrographyVocalization, Animalauditory cortexenvelope cuesspecies-specific vocalizationsspike timing

Identifiers

PMID23761696
PMCPMC3763096
OpenAlexW2075234537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.