Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23761108›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2013

A novel combinatorial therapy with pulp stem cells and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for total pulp regeneration.

Koichiro Iohara, Masashi Murakami, Norio Takeuchi, Yohei Osako, Masataka Ito, Ryo Ishizaka, Shinji Utunomiya, Hiroshi Nakamura, Kenji Matsushita, Misako Nakashima

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mutanobactin-D, aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models for dental pulp regeneration.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Koichiro IoharaDepartment of Dental Regenerative Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Research Institute, Obu, Japan.
Masashi Murakami
Norio Takeuchi
Yohei Osako
Masataka Ito
Ryo Ishizaka
Shinji Utunomiya
Hiroshi Nakamura
Kenji Matsushita
Misako Nakashima
National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology · JPAichi Gakuin University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPShin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of deep caries with pulpitis is a major challenge in dentistry. Stem cell therapy represents a potential strategy to regenerate the dentin-pulp complex, enabling conservation and restoration of teeth. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of pulp stem cell transplantation as a prelude for the impending clinical trials. Clinical-grade pulp stem cells were isolated and expanded according to good manufacturing practice conditions. The absence of contamination, abnormalities/aberrations in karyotype, and tumor formation after transplantation in an immunodeficient mouse ensured excellent quality control. After autologous transplantation of pulp stem cells with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in a dog pulpectomized tooth, regenerated pulp tissue including vasculature and innervation completely filled in the root canal, and regenerated dentin was formed in the coronal part and prevented microleakage up to day 180. Transplantation of pulp stem cells with G-CSF yielded a significantly larger amount of regenerated dentin-pulp complex compared with transplantation of G-CSF or stem cells alone. Also noteworthy was the reduction in the number of inflammatory cells and apoptotic cells and the significant increase in neurite outgrowth compared with results without G-CSF. The transplanted stem cells expressed angiogenic/neurotrophic factors. It is significant that G-CSF together with conditioned medium of pulp stem cells stimulated cell migration and neurite outgrowth, prevented cell death, and promoted immunosuppression in vitro. Furthermore, there was no evidence of toxicity or adverse events. In conclusion, the combinatorial trophic effects of pulp stem cells and G-CSF are of immediate utility for pulp/dentin regeneration, demonstrating the prerequisites of safety and efficacy critical for clinical applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MovementCells, CulturedCell SeparationCombined Modality TherapyDental PulpDental Pulp CavityDogsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorMiceMice, Mutant StrainsModels, AnimalRegenerationStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationTranscriptomeGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorAutologous stem cell transplantationDog modelG-CSFMesenchymal stem cellsPreclinical trialsStem cell cultureTissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID23761108
PMCPMC3697820
OpenAlexW2102021823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.