Trial reportObesity surgery2013
Intensive medical weight loss or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of mild to moderate obesity: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomised trial.
Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Relationship Between Obesity, Weight Loss and Health-Related Quality of Life: An Updated Systematic Review of Reviews.Clinical obesity · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- SICOB Italian clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of obesity and associated diseases using GRADE methodology on bariatric and metabolic surgery.Updates in surgery · 2025Guideline
- Bariatric Surgery and Remission of Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Surgery is associated with better long-term outcomes than pharmacological treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of total diet replacement programs on mental well-being: A systematic review with meta-analyses.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022Pooled it
- Quality of Life after Bariatric Surgery-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review with Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The comprehensive summary of surgical versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Quality of Life Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.Obesity surgery · 2016Pooled it
- Surgery for weight loss in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Diabetes and weight in comparative studies of bariatric surgery vs conventional medical therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2014Pooled it
- Trial
- Effects of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery on Weight Loss and Diabetes Remission Over 10 Years: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Therapy in Bariatric Surgery Patients With Morbid Obesity (PreMO): Rationale and Study Design for a Randomized Controlled Trial.The Journal of surgical research · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological, Endoscopic, and Surgical Treatments for Obesity: A GRADE-Based Network Meta-Analysis.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Metabolic and bariatric surgeries in individuals with obesity and BMI of 30-35 kg/m2: systematic review.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
- Comparative effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgeries: a network meta-analysis.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Review
- Bariatric Surgery for Patients with Overweight/Obesity. A Comprehensive Grading Methodology and Network Metanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Weight Loss Outcomes and Adverse Events.Obesity surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProven short-term effectiveness of obesity therapy should be re-evaluated in the long-term. The objective of this paper is to determine the long-term (10 years) outcome for patients from a randomised controlled trial (RCT).
methodsA RCT in 2002 compared laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) for obesity with non-surgical therapy. Follow-up has been conducted at 10 years. Eighty patients (BMI 30-35) were randomised to a non-surgical or a surgical program. Outcome data are available on 37 (92.5 %) of the surgical patients and 27 (62.5 %) of the non-surgical patients at 10 years.
resultsWeight change, the metabolic syndrome, quality of life, adverse events and direct costs of the surgical cohort were the main results of the study. A durable weight loss is present in the surgical group with a mean (SD) 10-year weight loss of 14.1 (7.7) kg (63.4 % EWL), better than the non-surgical group (mean (SD) = 0.4 (10.5) kg; p < 0.001). The metabolic syndrome was reduced from 14 to 4 of the 37 patients who completed 10 years within the LAGB groups. Proximal gastric enlargements occurred in 17 (30 %) of the 57 who had LAGB and removal of the band occurred in 7 (12 %). The annual maintenance costs including additional surgery was AUD $765 per patient per year.
conclusionsBariatric surgery with the LAGB can achieve long-term weight reduction which is better than a program of non-surgical therapy. There is also a sustained reduction of the metabolic syndrome. There is a significant maintenance requirement after LAGB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.