Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23760608›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2013

Development of policy performance indicators to assess the implementation of protection from exposure to secondhand smoke in China.

Xia Wan, Frances Stillman, Huilin Liu, Mark Spires, Zhen Dai, Stephen Tamplin, Daiwei Hu, Jonathan M Samet, Gonghuan Yang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xia WanDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences at Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine at Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Frances Stillman
Huilin Liu
Mark Spires
Zhen Dai
Stephen Tamplin
Daiwei Hu
Jonathan M Samet
Gonghuan Yang
Johns Hopkins University · USChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

FIC NIH HHS R01 RFA-TW-06-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop an approach for rapid assessment of tobacco control interventions in China. We examined the correlation between components of the Strength of Tobacco Control (SOTC) index and a proposed rapid evaluation indicator, the Policy Performance Indicator (PPI), which is based on protection of non-smokers from secondhand smoke (SHS). The PPI was used to assess the implementation of policies related to SHS at the provincial/municipal level in China.

methodsStratified random sampling was used to select five types of organisational and household respondents in two municipalities and five provinces in China (Shanghai and Tianjin, Heilongjiang, Henan, Guangdong, Zhejiang and Jiangxi, respectively). Data collection methods included key informant interviews, observation and intercept surveys (organisations), and a modified Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire (households). SOTC scores (SHS policy, capacity and efforts), PPI (no smoking in designated smoke-free places) and mid-term to long-term impact (knowledge, attitude and reduced exposure to SHS) were measured, and correlations among them were calculated.

resultsThe PPI varied across the seven locations. Shanghai led in the component indicators (at 56.5% for indoor workplaces and 49.1% for indoor public places, respectively), followed by Guangdong, Tianjin and Zhejiang (at 30-35% for these two indicators), and finally, Henan and Jiangxi (at 20-25%). Smoke-free policies were more effectively implemented at indoor workplaces than indoor public places. The PPI correlated well with certain components of the SOTC but not with the long-term indicators.

conclusionsThe PPI is useful for evaluating implementation of smoke-free policies. As tobacco control programmes are implemented, the PPI offers an indicator to track success and change strategies, without collecting data for a full SOTC index.

Indexed as

Health PolicySmoking PreventionAdolescentAdultAgedAir Pollution, IndoorChinaData CollectionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsSmoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionEnvironmentLow/Middle income countrySecondhand smoke

Identifiers

PMID23760608
PMCPMC3756506
OpenAlexW2128893071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.