Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23760351›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2013

Endovascular coil embolization of middle cerebral artery aneurysms of the proximal (M1) segment.

Young Dae Cho, Woong Jae Lee, Kang Min Kim, Hyun-Seung Kang, Jeong Eun Kim, Moon Hee Han

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Endovascular coil embolization of proximal middle cerebral artery aneurysms has better outcomes than other middle cerebral artery aneurysms: A retrospective study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Young Dae ChoDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Woong Jae Lee
Kang Min Kim
Hyun-Seung Kang
Jeong Eun Kim
Moon Hee Han
Seoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProximal middle cerebral artery (M1 segment) aneurysms have various configurations and are distinct from middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. We present the clinical and radiological results of coil embolization of the M1 segment aneurysms.

methodsFrom a prospective database, we retrieved the data for 59 consecutive patients harboring 60 M1 aneurysms that were treated with endovascular coil embolization from January 2006 to May 2012. We assessed the clinical outcomes of the patients and morphological outcomes of the aneurysms using the Raymond classification.

resultsThe aneurysms were located on the superior wall of the M1 segment in 43 and on the inferior wall in 17. Superior-wall aneurysms were related to the frontal cortical artery and the lateral lenticulostriate perforator while inferior-wall aneurysms were to the temporal cortical artery. With coil embolization, complete aneurysmal occlusion or residual neck could be achieved in 52 aneurysms (86.7 %) and residual aneurysm in 8. The microcatheter protection technique was most commonly used for coil embolization (41.7 %) followed by single microcatheter (31.7 %), double microcatheter (23.3 %), and stent protection (3.3 %). There was no procedure-related morbidity or mortality. Follow-up angiography more than 6 months after embolization (n = 46; mean 12.4 months) demonstrated stable occlusion in 40 (87.0 %), minor recanalization in 4 (8.7 %), and major recanalization in 2 (4.3 %). One patient experienced delayed cerebral infarction without permanent neurologic deficit.

conclusionCoil embolization in M1 aneurysms seems to be safe and efficacious, although it may require various technical strategies due to distinct anatomic configurations.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMechanical ThrombolysisMiddle AgedPrevalenceRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23760351
OpenAlexW2078355115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.