Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23760253›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2013

Quantitative and qualitative differences in the T cell response to HIV in uninfected Ugandans exposed or unexposed to HIV-infected partners.

Pietro Pala, Jennifer Serwanga, Christine Watera, Adam J Ritchie, Zoe Moodie, Maggie Wang, Nilu Goonetilleke, Ester Birabwa, Peter Hughes, David Senkaali and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. HIV-1-specific CD8PNAS nexus · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pietro PalaMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda. pietro.pala@mrcuganda.org
Jennifer Serwanga
Christine Watera
Adam J Ritchie
Zoe Moodie
Maggie Wang
Nilu Goonetilleke
Ester Birabwa
Peter Hughes
David Senkaali
Ritah Nakiboneka
Heiner Grosskurth
Bart Haynes
Andrew McMichael
Pontiano Kaleebu
Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology
Uganda Virus Research Institute · UGUniversity of Oxford · GBFred Hutch Cancer Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Viral Sequencing CoreU19AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CRUMP, JOHN ANDREW · 2006 to 2011
$290.5M
Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEVEN Grant DEEKS · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
Medical Research Council MC_U950097145NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067854NIAID NIH HHS U19-AI067854-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV-exposed and yet persistently uninfected individuals have been an intriguing, repeated observation in multiple studies, but uncertainty persists on the significance and implications of this in devising protective strategies against HIV. We carried out a cross-sectional analysis of exposed uninfected partners in a Ugandan cohort of heterosexual serodiscordant couples (37.5% antiretroviral therapy naive) comparing their T cell responses to HIV peptides with those of unexposed uninfected individuals. We used an objective definition of exposure and inclusion criteria, blinded ex vivo and cultured gamma interferon (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunospot assays, and multiparameter flow cytometry and intracellular cytokine staining to investigate the features of the HIV-specific response in exposed versus unexposed uninfected individuals. A response rate to HIV was detectable in unexposed uninfected (5.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.3 to 8.1%) and, at a significantly higher level (12.5%, 95% CI = 9.7 to 15.4%, P = 0.0004), in exposed uninfected individuals. The response rate to Gag was significantly higher in exposed uninfected (10/50 [20.%]) compared to unexposed uninfected (1/35 [2.9%]) individuals (P = 0.0004). The magnitude of responses was also greater in exposed uninfected individuals but not statistically significant. The average number of peptide pools recognized was significantly higher in exposed uninfected subjects than in unexposed uninfected subjects (1.21 versus 0.47; P = 0.0106). The proportion of multifunctional responses was different in the two groups, with a higher proportion of single cytokine responses, mostly IFN-γ, in unexposed uninfected individuals compared to exposed uninfected individuals. Our findings demonstrate both quantitative and qualitative differences in T cell reactivity to HIV between HESN (HIV exposed seronegative) and HUSN (HIV unexposed seronegative) subject groups but do not discriminate as to whether they represent markers of exposure or of protection against HIV infection.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesCytokinesEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayFamily CharacteristicsFamily HealthFemaleFlow CytometryHIVHumansMaleT-LymphocytesUgandaCytokines

Identifiers

PMID23760253
PMCPMC3754030
OpenAlexW2100199918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.