Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23759897›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2015

Research advisory board members' contributions and expectations in the USA.

R M Pinto, Anya Y Spector, R Rahman, J D Gastolomendo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Building a diverse national research advisory board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Interprofessional Collaboration and On-the-Job Training Improve Access to HIV Testing, HIV Primary Care, and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP).AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R M PintoColumbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA rmp98@columbia.edu.
Anya Y SpectorHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
R RahmanColumbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA.
J D GastolomendoLatino Commission on AIDS, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI Claude Ann Mellins · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
INSPIRE : Interdisciplinary Social and Behavioral Science Prevention and Intervention REsearch in HIVT32MH019139 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Claude Ann Mellins, Jae M. Sevelius · 1989 to 2026
$10.8M
Interagency Collaboration to Implement Effective Behavioral Interventions - DEBIsR01MH095676 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PINTO, ROGERIO M. · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
Promoting Community Collaboration in HIV ResearchK01MH081787 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PINTO, ROGERIO M. · 2007 to 2011
$875k
NIMH NIH HHS K01MH081787NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095676NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH19139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on the Implementation Community Collaborative Board (I-CCB) to identify members' anticipated contributions to and returns from the I-CCB; examine whether or not members achieved these contributions and returns over time; and explore barriers and facilitators that influenced accomplishments. Longitudinal study with repeated semi-structured in-depth interviews; baseline captured anticipated contributions and returns; 6- and 18-month follow-ups short- and longer-term achievements. We used content analysis to code/reduce text into variables, describe, count and compare categories. Participants anticipated involvement in I-CCB dynamics/governance and in research tasks/procedures. Anticipated returns included social support. Participants exerting influence on I-CCB's research agenda stayed the same over time. Participants conducting research doubled between follow-ups; those writing grant proposals increased by 50%. Participants receiving emotional support remained the same. Challenges: meetings steered by researchers; lack of time; use of jargon. Facilitators: outreaching to community; being affected by HIV; having overlapping identities/roles as researcher, service consumer and/or practitioner. Research partners can maximize facilitators, redress barriers and improve advisory board members' retention. Findings may help optimize the functioning of advisory boards worldwide.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAdvisory CommitteesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleResearch DesignUnited StatesCBPRcommunity advisory boardengagement and retentionHIV/AIDS

Identifiers

PMID23759897
PMCPMC4426895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.