Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23759585›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2013

Attaching to spindles before they form: do early incorrect chromosome-microtubule attachments promote meiotic segregation fidelity?

Régis E Meyer, Dean S Dawson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Régis E MeyerCell Cycle and Cancer Biology; Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation; Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Dean S Dawson
Cycle (Germany) · DEOklahoma Medical Research Foundation · US

Funding

Meiotic Centromere Behavior in YeastR01GM087377 · NIGMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI DAWSON, DEAN S · 2010 to 2017
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM087377NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proper partitioning of the genome during meiosis depends on the correct segregation of chromosomes. Errors in this process result in the production of aneuploid gametes, a major cause of birth defects and infertility in humans. In order to segregate properly in meiosis, homologous chromosome partners must attach to microtubules that emanate from opposites poles of the spindle. However, a recent study in yeast has shown that, remarkably, the initial attachments between microtubules and the chromosomes are usually incorrect, which would lead to catastrophic segregation errors, but they are nearly always corrected through the detachment and reattachment of the microtubules. Here we review the reasons for the initial incorrect attachments, which stem from the timing of their formation early in the spindle assembly process, and the fact that the microtubule organizers, called spindle pole bodies in yeast, are not equal. One spindle pole body is older and better able to produce microtubules that attach to the chromosomes. We draw parallels to recent findings in animal cells and suggest that these early microtubule attachments, while often incorrect, may serve an important role in spindle assembly, which, in the long-term, promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation.

Indexed as

MeiosisAnimalsChromosome SegregationChromosomes, FungalHumansMicrotubule-Organizing CenterMicrotubulesMitosisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpindle ApparatusSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinscentrosomekinetochorere-orientationspindle asymmetryspindle pole body

Identifiers

PMID23759585
PMCPMC3737303
OpenAlexW2035965664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.