ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2013
Impact of glucose measurement processing delays on clinical accuracy and relevance.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of the GTT@home Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Kit in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Performance Evaluation Study.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Dilemmas in parenteral glucose delivery and approach to glucose monitoring and interpretation in the neonate.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Review
- Impact of High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C for Treatment of Sepsis on Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Readings.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Glucose concentrations in enterally fed preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020Article
- Analysis: New point-of-care blood glucose monitoring system for the hospital demonstrates satisfactory analytical accuracy using blood from critically ill patients--an important step toward improved blood glucose control in the hospital.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn a hospital setting, glucose is often measured from venous blood in the clinical laboratory. However, laboratory glucose measurements are typically not available in real time. In practice, turn-around times for laboratory measurements can be minutes to hours. This analysis assesses the impact of turn-around time on the effective clinical accuracy of laboratory measurements.
methodsData obtained from an earlier study with 58 subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) were used for this analysis. In the study, glucose measurements using a YSI glucose analyzer were obtained from venous blood samples every 15 min while the subjects were at the health care facility. To simulate delayed laboratory results, each YSI glucose value from a subject was paired with one from a later time point (from the same subject) separated by 15, 30, 45, and 60 min. To assess the clinical accuracy of a delayed YSI result relative to a real-time result, the percentage of YSI pairs that meet the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15197:2003(E) standard for glucose measurement accuracy (±15 mg/dl for blood glucose < 75 mg/dl, ±20% for blood glucose ≥ 75 mg/dl) was calculated.
resultsIt was observed that delays of 15 min or more reduce clinical accuracy below the ISO 15197:2003(E) recommendation of 95%. The accuracy was less than 65% for delays of 60 min.
conclusionThis analysis suggests that processing delays in glucose measurements reduce the clinical relevance of results in patients with T1DM and may similarly degrade the clinical value of measurements in other patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.