Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23758942›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2013

Intensive care sedation: the past, present and the future.

Yahya Shehabi, Rinaldo Bellomo, Sangeeta Mehta, Richard Riker, Jukka Takala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation, SPICE and beyond, Rinaldo's legacy in sedation and delirium research.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inhaled Anesthetics for Sedation in ICU: Widening Horizons!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sedating critically ill patients.Singapore medical journal · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yahya Shehabi
Rinaldo Bellomo
Sangeeta Mehta
Richard Riker
Jukka Takala

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the universal prescription of sedative drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU), current practice is not guided by high-level evidence. Landmark sedation trials have made significant contributions to our understanding of the problems associated with ICU sedation and have promoted changes to current practice. We identified challenges and limitations of clinical trials which reduced the generalizability and the universal adoption of key interventions. We present an international perspective regarding current sedation practice and a blueprint for future research, which seeks to avoid known limitations and generate much-needed high-level evidence to better guide clinicians' management and therapeutic choices of sedative agents.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAnesthesiaCritical CareForecastingHumansHypnotics and SedativesProcedural SedationHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID23758942
PMCPMC3706847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.