Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23758735›Full record

ArticleTheoretical biology & medical modelling2013

An integrated multidisciplinary model describing initiation of cancer and the Warburg hypothesis.

Edward A Rietman, Douglas E Friesen, Philip Hahnfeldt, Robert Gatenby, Lynn Hlatky, Jack A Tuszynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cell cycle progression is regulated by intertwined redox oscillators.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edward A RietmanCenter of Cancer Systems Biology, GeneSys Research Institute, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02142, USA. edward.rietman@tufts.edu
Douglas E Friesen
Philip Hahnfeldt
Robert Gatenby
Lynn Hlatky
Jack A Tuszynski

Funding

Project 5 UC BerkleyU54CA149233 · NCI · STEWARD ST. ELIZABETH'S MEDICAL CENTER · PI HLATKY, LYNN · 2010 to 2014
$7.3M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149233NCI NIH HHS U54CA149233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this paper we propose a chemical physics mechanism for the initiation of the glycolytic switch commonly known as the Warburg hypothesis, whereby glycolytic activity terminating in lactate continues even in well-oxygenated cells. We show that this may result in cancer via mitotic failure, recasting the current conception of the Warburg effect as a metabolic dysregulation consequent to cancer, to a biophysical defect that may contribute to cancer initiation. MODEL: Our model is based on analogs of thermodynamic concepts that tie non-equilibrium fluid dynamics ultimately to metabolic imbalance, disrupted microtubule dynamics, and finally, genomic instability, from which cancers can arise. Specifically, we discuss how an analog of non-equilibrium Rayleigh-Benard convection can result in glycolytic oscillations and cause a cell to become locked into a higher-entropy state characteristic of cancer.

conclusionsA quantitative model is presented that attributes the well-known Warburg effect to a biophysical mechanism driven by a convective disturbance in the cell. Contrary to current understanding, this effect may precipitate cancer development, rather than follow from it, providing new insights into carcinogenesis, cancer treatment, and prevention.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticModels, TheoreticalCytoskeletonGlycolysisHumansNeoplasmsOrganellesThermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID23758735
PMCPMC3689044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.