Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23758654›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2013

Differential response of bovine mammary epithelial cells to Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli agonists of the innate immune system.

Florence B Gilbert, Patricia Cunha, Kirsty Jensen, Elizabeth J Glass, Gilles Foucras, Christèle Robert-Granié, Rachel Rupp, Pascal Rainard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
27.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sodium Butyrate MitigatesVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Loss of IL10RA rewires epithelial immune responses to intracellularFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mechanisms of host-bacterial interactions duringFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The current state of phage therapy in livestock and companion animals.Journal of animal science and technology · 2024
    Review
  18. Exploring the Potential Mechanisms of Action ofCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
    Article
  19. The Yeast and Hypha Phases ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Florence B GilbertINRA, UMR1282, ISP, F 37380, Nouzilly, France. pascal.rainard@tours.inra.fr.
Patricia Cunha
Kirsty Jensen
Elizabeth J Glass
Gilles Foucras
Christèle Robert-Granié
Rachel Rupp
Pascal Rainard
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MAUniversité de Tours · FRPhysiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements · FRRoslin Institute · GBUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/K001744/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mastitis caused by Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus is a major pathology of dairy cows. To better understand the differential response of the mammary gland to these two pathogens, we stimulated bovine mammary epithelial cells (bMEC) with either E. coli crude lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or with S. aureus culture supernatant (SaS) to compare the transcriptomic profiles of the initial bMEC response. By using HEK 293 reporter cells for pattern recognition receptors, the LPS preparation was found to stimulate TLR2 and TLR4 but not TLR5, Nod1 or Nod2, whereas SaS stimulated TLR2. Biochemical analysis revealed that lipoteichoic acid, protein A and α-hemolysin were all present in SaS, and bMEC were found to be responsive to each of these molecules. Transcriptome profiling revealed a core innate immune response partly shared by LPS and SaS. However, LPS induced expression of a significant higher number of genes and the fold changes were of greater magnitude than those induced by SaS. Microarray data analysis suggests that the activation pathways and the early chemokine and cytokine production preceded the defense and stress responses. A major differential response was the activation of the type I IFN pathway by LPS but not by SaS. The higher upregulation of chemokines (Cxcl10, Ccl2, Ccl5 and Ccl20) that target mononuclear leucocytes by LPS than by SaS is likely to be related to the differential activation of the type I IFN pathway, and could induce a different profile of the initial recruitment of leucocytes. The MEC responses to the two stimuli were different, as LPS was associated with NF-κB and Fas signaling pathways, whereas SaS was associated with AP-1 and IL-17A signaling pathways. It is noteworthy that at the protein level secretion of TNF-α and IL-1β was not induced by either stimulus. These results suggest that the response of MEC to diffusible stimuli from E. coli and S. aureus contributes to the onset of the response with differential leucocyte recruitment and distinct inflammatory and innate immune reactions of the mammary gland to infection.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsCattleCells, CulturedChemokinesCytokinesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpithelial CellsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHEK293 CellsHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsChemokinesCytokinesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLipopolysaccharidesNod Signaling Adaptor ProteinsToll-Like Receptors

Identifiers

PMID23758654
PMCPMC3686618
OpenAlexW2097991167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.