Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23758635›Full record

ReviewGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2013

Epigenetics and phenotypic variability: some interesting insights from birds.

Laure Frésard, Mireille Morisson, Jean-Michel Brun, Anne Collin, Bertrand Pain, Francis Minvielle, Frédérique Pitel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Livestock species as emerging models for genomic imprinting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Laure FrésardINRA, UMR444, Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, Castanet-Tolosan F-31326, France.
Mireille Morisson
Jean-Michel Brun
Anne Collin
Bertrand Pain
Francis Minvielle
Frédérique Pitel
Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire · FRBiologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture · FRDépartement Biologie et Amélioration des Plantes · FRGénétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about epigenetic mechanisms in birds with the exception of the phenomenon of dosage compensation of sex chromosomes, although such mechanisms could be involved in the phenotypic variability of birds, as in several livestock species. This paper reviews the literature on epigenetic mechanisms that could contribute significantly to trait variability in birds, and compares the results to the existing knowledge of epigenetic mechanisms in mammals. The main issues addressed in this paper are: (1) Does genomic imprinting exist in birds? (2) How does the embryonic environment influence the adult phenotype in avian species? (3) Does the embryonic environment have an impact on phenotypic variability across several successive generations? The potential for epigenetic studies to improve the performance of individual animals through the implementation of limited changes in breeding conditions or the addition of new parameters in selection models is still an open question.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticPhenotypeAnimalsBiological EvolutionBirdsEnvironmentFemaleGene-Environment InteractionGenomic ImprintingMale

Identifiers

PMID23758635
PMCPMC3693910
OpenAlexW2120200106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.