Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23758478›Full record

ArticleOmics : a journal of integrative biology2013

Redundancy control in pathway databases (ReCiPa): an application for improving gene-set enrichment analysis in Omics studies and "Big data" biology.

Juan C Vivar, Priscilla Pemu, Ruth McPherson, Sujoy Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Omics : a journal of integrative biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathway Analysis Interpretation in the Multi-Omic Era.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan C VivarBiomedical Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Priscilla Pemu
Ruth McPherson
Sujoy Ghosh

Funding

Morehouse School of Medicine Center of Excellence Research Endowment ProgramS21MD000101 · NIMHD · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MONTGOMERY-RICE, VALERIE C. · 2001 to 2015
$74.3M
ROLES OF INFLAMMATION AND ANDROGEN METABOLISM IN PROSTATE CANCER DISPARITYP20MD000175 · NIMHD · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI KIMBRO, KEVIN SEAN · 2002 to 2016
$15.6M
Morehouse School of Medicine Center of Clinical Research ExcellenceU54RR022814 · NCRR · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GIBBONS, GARY H · 2005 to 2009
$5.8M
Renewal Application for Clinical Research Education and Career Development (CRECDR25RR017694 · NCRR · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI OFILI, ELIZABETH O. · 2002 to 2011
$5.5M
SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF A LARGE SCALE GENETIC STUDY IN OBESITY AND RELATED OUTCOMESR21DK088319 · NIDDK · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI GHOSH, SUJOY · 2010 to 2011
$316k
CIHR MOP2390941NCRR NIH HHS RR017694-06A1NCRR NIH HHS RR022814NCRR NIH HHS RR11104NHLBI NIH HHS HL059868NIDDK NIH HHS DK088319NIMHD NIH HHS MD000175NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000175NIMHD NIH HHS S21 MD000101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract Unparalleled technological advances have fueled an explosive growth in the scope and scale of biological data and have propelled life sciences into the realm of "Big Data" that cannot be managed or analyzed by conventional approaches. Big Data in the life sciences are driven primarily via a diverse collection of 'omics'-based technologies, including genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, metagenomics, and lipidomics. Gene-set enrichment analysis is a powerful approach for interrogating large 'omics' datasets, leading to the identification of biological mechanisms associated with observed outcomes. While several factors influence the results from such analysis, the impact from the contents of pathway databases is often under-appreciated. Pathway databases often contain variously named pathways that overlap with one another to varying degrees. Ignoring such redundancies during pathway analysis can lead to the designation of several pathways as being significant due to high content-similarity, rather than truly independent biological mechanisms. Statistically, such dependencies also result in correlated p values and overdispersion, leading to biased results. We investigated the level of redundancies in multiple pathway databases and observed large discrepancies in the nature and extent of pathway overlap. This prompted us to develop the application, ReCiPa (Redundancy Control in Pathway Databases), to control redundancies in pathway databases based on user-defined thresholds. Analysis of genomic and genetic datasets, using ReCiPa-generated overlap-controlled versions of KEGG and Reactome pathways, led to a reduction in redundancy among the top-scoring gene-sets and allowed for the inclusion of additional gene-sets representing possibly novel biological mechanisms. Using obesity as an example, bioinformatic analysis further demonstrated that gene-sets identified from overlap-controlled pathway databases show stronger evidence of prior association to obesity compared to pathways identified from the original databases.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansMetabolomicsObesitySignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID23758478
PMCPMC3727566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.