Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23758125›Full record

ReviewZebrafish2013

Automated processing of zebrafish imaging data: a survey.

Ralf Mikut, Thomas Dickmeis, Wolfgang Driever, Pierre Geurts, Fred A Hamprecht, Bernhard X Kausler, María J Ledesma-Carbayo, Raphaël Marée, Karol Mikula, Periklis Pantazis and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zebrafish, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. An automated quantitative image analysis pipeline ofJournal of biological methods · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Systems Biology to Support Nanomaterial Grouping.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Zebrafish in Toxicology and Environmental Health.Current topics in developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Ralf MikutKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. ralf.mikut@kit.edu
Thomas Dickmeis
Wolfgang Driever
Pierre Geurts
Fred A Hamprecht
Bernhard X Kausler
María J Ledesma-Carbayo
Raphaël Marée
Karol Mikula
Periklis Pantazis
Olaf Ronneberger
Andres Santos
Rainer Stotzka
Uwe Strähle
Nadine Peyriéras
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Liège · BECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRETH Zurich · CHSlovak University of Technology in Bratislava · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the relative transparency of its embryos and larvae, the zebrafish is an ideal model organism for bioimaging approaches in vertebrates. Novel microscope technologies allow the imaging of developmental processes in unprecedented detail, and they enable the use of complex image-based read-outs for high-throughput/high-content screening. Such applications can easily generate Terabytes of image data, the handling and analysis of which becomes a major bottleneck in extracting the targeted information. Here, we describe the current state of the art in computational image analysis in the zebrafish system. We discuss the challenges encountered when handling high-content image data, especially with regard to data quality, annotation, and storage. We survey methods for preprocessing image data for further analysis, and describe selected examples of automated image analysis, including the tracking of cells during embryogenesis, heartbeat detection, identification of dead embryos, recognition of tissues and anatomical landmarks, and quantification of behavioral patterns of adult fish. We review recent examples for applications using such methods, such as the comprehensive analysis of cell lineages during early development, the generation of a three-dimensional brain atlas of zebrafish larvae, and high-throughput drug screens based on movement patterns. Finally, we identify future challenges for the zebrafish image analysis community, notably those concerning the compatibility of algorithms and data formats for the assembly of modular analysis pipelines.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedZebrafishAnimalsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID23758125
PMCPMC3760023
OpenAlexW2138476437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.