Trial reportJournal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists2014
Randomized clinical trial of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: preliminary results.
Trial report in Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01729858 (Factors Influencing the Survival of Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Prostheses), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Factors Influencing the Survival of Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Prostheses
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Factors influencing the survival of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic prostheses: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.Journal of dentistry · 2020Trial
- Effect of connector size and configuration on the fracture resistance of a long-span implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed partial denture (An in vitro Study).BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Zirconia-ceramic versus metal-ceramic implant-supported multiunit fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Dental research journal · 2024Review
- Prospective evaluation of implants-supported, tooth-implant supported, and teeth-supported 3-unit posterior monolithic zirconia fixed restorations: Bite force and patient satisfaction.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2023Article
- Proof testing to improve the reliability and lifetime of ceramic dental prostheses.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2023Article
- Finite Element Analysis of an Implant-Supported FDP with Different Connector Heights.Symmetry · 2022Article
- Review
- Fracture of Lithia Disilicate Ceramics under Different Environmental Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- An Integrated Fully Digital Prosthetic Workflow for the Immediate Full-Arch Restoration of Edentulous Patients-A Case Report.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Different Connector Designs for All-Ceramic Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.Ceramics · 2022Article
- Forensic and reliability analyses of fixed dental prostheses.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2021Article
- Technical and Biological Complications of Screw-Retained (CAD/CAM) Monolithic and Partial Veneer Zirconia for Fixed Dental Prostheses on Posterior Implants Using a Digital Workflow: A 3-Year Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Fracture behavior of single-structure fiber-reinforced composite restorations.Acta biomaterialia odontologica Scandinavica · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to determine the survival rates over time of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic and metal-ceramic prostheses as a function of core-veneer thickness ratio, gingival connector embrasure design, and connector height. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn IRB-approved, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted as a single-blind pilot study involving 55 patients missing three teeth in either one or two posterior areas. These patients (34 women; 21 men; age range 52-75 years) were recruited for the study to receive a three-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP). Two implants were placed for each of the 72 FDPs in the study. The implants (Osseospeed, Astra Tech), which were made of titanium, were grit blasted. A gold-shaded, custom-milled titanium abutment (Atlantis, Astra Tech), was secured to each implant body. Each of the 72 FDPs in 55 patients were randomly assigned based on one of the following options: (1) A. MATERIAL: ceramic-ceramic (Yttria-stabilized zirconia core, pressable fluorapatite glass-ceramic, IPS e.max ZirCAD, and ZirPress, Ivoclar Vivadent) B. metal-ceramic (palladium-based noble alloy, Capricorn, Ivoclar Vivadent, with press-on leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic veneer, IPS InLine POM, Ivoclar Vivadent); (2) occlusal veneer thickness (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm); (3) curvature of gingival embrasure (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mm diameter); and (4) connector height (3, 4, and 5 mm). FDPs were fabricated and cemented with dual-cure resin cement (RelyX, Universal Cement, 3M ESPE). Patients were recalled at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. FDPs were examined for cracks, fracture, and general surface quality.
resultsRecall exams of 72 prostheses revealed 10 chipping fractures. No fractures occurred within the connector or embrasure areas. Two-sided Fisher's exact tests showed no significant correlation between fractures and type of material system (p = 0.51), veneer thickness (p = 0.75), radius of curvature of gingival embrasure (p = 0.68), and connector height (p = 0.91).
conclusionsAlthough there were no significant associations between connector height, curvature of gingival embrasure, core/veneer thickness ratio, and material system and the survival probability of implant-supported FDPs with zirconia as a core material, the small number of fractures precludes a definitive conclusion on the dominant controlling factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.