Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23757032›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2013

Safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: a1chieve sub-analysis.

Hoosen Randeree, Andreas Liebl, Issam Hajjaji, Mohammad Khamseh, Lenita Zajdenverg, Jian-Wen Chen, Jihad Haddad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00869908 (The Effect of NovoMix® 30, Levemir® or NovoRapid®), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00869908 completednot on this map

The Effect of NovoMix® 30, Levemir® or NovoRapid® (Alone or in Combination) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Previously Treated With Other Anti-diabetic Medication. A 24-week, International, Prospective, Multi-centre, Open-labelled, Non-interventional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2008 to 2011Enrolled66,726ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Armsinsulin aspart, insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Hoosen RandereeParklands Medical Centre, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Andreas Liebl
Issam Hajjaji
Mohammad Khamseh
Lenita Zajdenverg
Jian-Wen Chen
Jihad Haddad
Novo Nordisk (Switzerland) · CHTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRThe Farah Hospital · JOUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Tripoli · LY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart [with/without oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLDs)] as the only insulin therapy.

methodsA1chieve was an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, observational, 24-week study in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus starting/switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30, insulin detemir or insulin aspart treatment (alone/in combination) in routine clinical practice. This sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart (±OGLDs) as the only insulin therapy. Data were analyzed for all patients, insulin-experienced and insulin-naive sub-groups, and sub-groups defined by the number of OGLDs prescribed at baseline (no OGLDs, one OGLD or ≥two OGLDs). Safety and effectiveness endpoints were assessed at baseline and following 24 weeks' therapy.

resultsIn total, 2,026 patients were included (insulin-experienced, n = 561; insulin-naive, n = 1,465) in this sub-analysis. Significant improvements from baseline after 24 weeks' treatment with insulin aspart ± OGLDs were observed across all sub-groups for: glycated hemoglobin (range of means across sub-groups -1.6 to -2.4%; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), fasting plasma glucose (-2.5 to -3.8 mmol/l; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), post-breakfast post-prandial glucose (-3.4 to -5.8 mmol/l; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The proportion of patients reporting hypoglycemia events was significantly reduced from baseline after 24 weeks (insulin-naive cohort: 7.9-2.8%; p < 0.001; insulin-experienced cohort: 23.2-7.8%; p < 0.001). There were no reports of major hypoglycemia events at 24 weeks; risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia was <0.6 events/person-year. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported.

conclusionInsulin aspart ± OGLDs is associated with significant improvements in glycemic control and HRQoL, without increased risk of hypoglycemia, in people with type 2 diabetes and sub-optimal glucose control.

Identifiers

PMID23757032
PMCPMC3687096
OpenAlexW2156383186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.