Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23756775›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2013

Outcomes after emergency versus elective ventral hernia repair: a prospective nationwide study.

Frederik Helgstrand, Jacob Rosenberg, Henrik Kehlet, Thue Bisgaard

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Laparoscopic versus open repair for umbilical hernia: outcomes and complications.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Emergency hernia hospitalizations in older adults with and without multimorbidity.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential and feasibility of preoptimisation in ventral hernia repair- a focus group study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Operative decision making for repair of emergent primary and recurrent ventral hernia.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025
    Article
  19. A Woman With Painful Umbilicus.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Review
  20. Risk factors for incarceration in groin hernia: a prospective observational study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Observational

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frederik HelgstrandDanish Ventral Hernia Database, Copenhagen, Denmark. helgstrand@me.com
Jacob Rosenberg
Henrik Kehlet
Thue Bisgaard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly surgical results after emergency repairs for the most frequent ventral hernias (epigastric, umbilical, and incisional) are not well described. Thus, the aim of present study was to investigate early results and risk factors for poor 30-day outcome after emergency versus elective repair for ventral hernias.

methodsAll patients undergoing epigastric, umbilical, or incisional hernia repair registered in the Danish Hernia Database during the period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2010 were included in the prospective study. Follow-up was obtained through administrative data from the Danish National Patient Register.

resultsIn total, 10,041 elective and 935 emergency repairs were included. The risk for 30-day mortality, reoperation, and readmission was significantly higher (by a factor 2-15) after emergency repairs than after elective repairs (p ≤ 0.003). In addition, there were significantly more patients with concomitant bowel resection after emergency repairs than after elective repairs (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for emergency umbilical/epigastric hernia repair were female gender, older age, hernia defects >2-7 cm, and repair for a primary hernia (vs recurrent hernia) (all p < 0.05). Independent risk factors for emergency incisional hernia repair were female gender, increasing age, and hernia defects ≤7 cm (all p < 0.05).

conclusionsEmergency umbilical/epigastric or incisional hernia repair was beset with up to 15-fold higher mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates than elective repair. Older age, female gender, and umbilical hernia defects between 2 and 7 cm or incisional hernia defects up to 7 cm were important risk factors for emergency repair.

Indexed as

Elective Surgical ProceduresHerniorrhaphyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDenmarkEmergenciesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHernia, VentralHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds Ratio

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.