Many more reasons behind difficulties in recruiting patients to randomized controlled trials in psychiatry.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A case management occupational health model to facilitate earlier return to work of NHS staff with common mental health disorders: a feasibility study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021
   Trial
2. The impact of advertising patient and public involvement on trial recruitment: embedded cluster randomised recruitment trial.Trials · 2016
   Trial
3. Developing and testing a case-management intervention to support the return to work of health care workers with common mental health disorders.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2023
   Article
4. Does psychostimulant treatment in children with ADHD increase later risk of substance use disorder?Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as