Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23756139›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2013

Age of exposure-dependent effects of amphetamine on behavioral flexibility.

Emily R Hankosky, Nikki M Kofsky, Joshua M Gulley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adolescence and Reward: Making Sense of Neural and Behavioral Changes Amid the Chaos.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily R HankoskyDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 731 Psychology Building MC-716, 603 East Daniel Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Nikki M Kofsky
Joshua M Gulley
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Mechanisms of amphetamine-induced plasticity in adolescents compared to adultsR01DA029815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GULLEY, JOSHUA M · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug use typically begins during adolescence, which is a period of ongoing neurobiological development that may confer heightened vulnerability to develop drug dependence. Previously, our lab has shown that amphetamine (AMPH)-induced deficits in a medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)-sensitive working memory task are greater in rats exposed to the drug during adolescence compared to adulthood. Here, we examine potential age-dependent effects of AMPH exposure on behavioral flexibility tasks that are sensitive to disruptions in mPFC and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) function. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected (i.p.) with saline or 3mg/kg AMPH every other day between postnatal days (PNDs) 27-45 and PNDs 85-103. Starting around PND 125, rats were tested in an attentional set-shifting task and a subset of those was then tested in an operant strategy shifting task. Following completion of the operant task, rats were challenged with 3mg/kg AMPH and monitored in open field chambers. Our results demonstrate that AMPH-exposed rats were faster to acquire simple and compound discriminations, but were impaired during the first stimulus-reward reversal when compared to controls. In the operant strategy shifting task, adolescent-exposed rats shifted more rapidly between strategies and completed reversals faster than adult-exposed and control rats, respectively. The final AMPH challenge revealed evidence for sensitization in drug pre-exposed rats, with adult-exposed animals exhibiting the most significant effects. Together, these results suggest that AMPH induces long-lasting changes in behavioral flexibility that are at least partially dependent on age of exposure and may be due to adaptations in OFC function.

Indexed as

AgingAdaptation, PhysiologicalAmphetamineAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAttentionCentral Nervous System StimulantsConditioning, OperantDiscrimination, PsychologicalExploratory BehaviorFood DeprivationMaleMotor ActivityOdorantsRatsAmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsAdolescenceAmphetamineBehavioral flexibilityPrefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID23756139
PMCPMC3742571
OpenAlexW2117906579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.