Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23756045›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2013

Skeletal muscle programming and re-programming.

Abraham P Fong, Stephen J Tapscott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unlocking the Transcriptional Control ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abraham P FongClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Stephen J Tapscott
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

LINEAGE DETERMINATION IN MUSCLER01AR045113 · NIAMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI TAPSCOTT, STEPHEN J · 1998 to 2017
$6.8M
Mechanisms of bHLH Mediated Lineage SpecificationK08CA169014 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI FONG, ABRAHAM P. · 2012 to 2014
$477k
NCI NIH HHS 1K08CA169014-01NCI NIH HHS K08 CA169014NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR045113NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR045113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of the transcription factor MyoD and its ability to induce muscle differentiation was the first demonstration of genetically programmed cell transdifferentiation. MyoD functions by activating a feed-forward circuit to regulate muscle gene expression. This requires binding to specific E-boxes throughout the genome, followed by recruitment of chromatin modifying complexes and transcription machinery. MyoD binding can be modified by both cooperative factors and inhibitors, including microRNAs that may serve as important developmental switches. Recent studies indicate that epigenetic regulation of MyoD binding sites is another important mechanism for controlling MyoD activity, which may ultimately limit its ability to induce transdifferentiation to cells with permissive epigenetic 'landscapes.'

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCell DifferentiationCell TransdifferentiationDNA-Binding ProteinsE-Box ElementsEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMiceMicroRNAsMuscle, SkeletalMyoD ProteinTranscription, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsMicroRNAsMyoD Protein

Identifiers

PMID23756045
PMCPMC3775946
OpenAlexW2083590085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.