Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23755354›Full record

Articlei-Perception2013

Inferred motion perception of light sources in 3D scenes is color-blind.

Holly E Gerhard, Laurence T Maloney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in i-Perception, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Holly E GerhardDepartment of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA; Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Otfried-Mueller-Strasse 25, Tuebingen 72076, Germany; e-mail: hgerhard@gmail.com.
Laurence T Maloney
New York University · US

Funding

SHAPE REPRESENTATION AND MULTIPLE DEPTH CUESR01EY008266 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL S LANDY · 1989 to 2026
$7.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In everyday scenes, the illuminant can vary spatially in chromaticity and luminance, and change over time (e.g. sunset). Such variation generates dramatic image effects too complex for any contemporary machine vision system to overcome, yet human observers are remarkably successful at inferring object properties separately from lighting, an ability linked with estimation and tracking of light field parameters. Which information does the visual system use to infer light field dynamics? Here, we specifically ask whether color contributes to inferred light source motion. Observers viewed 3D surfaces illuminated by an out-of-view moving collimated source (sun) and a diffuse source (sky). In half of the trials, the two sources differed in chromaticity, thereby providing more information about motion direction. Observers discriminated light motion direction above chance, and only the least sensitive observer benefited slightly from the added color information, suggesting that color plays only a very minor role for inferring light field dynamics.

Indexed as

3D perceptioncolor constancyillumination perceptionmaterial perceptionmotion perceptionscene understanding

Identifiers

PMID23755354
PMCPMC3677337
OpenAlexW2159993551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.