Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23755325›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2013

Disseminating and implementing evidence-based practice.

Jonathan I Bisson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trauma and trauma care in Europe.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2018
    Review
  2. Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 20 years of European society for traumatic stress.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2013
    Article
  6. European psychotraumatology - alongside the recent European history.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2013
    Article
  7. ESTSS and ISTSS: "heterozygous twins".European journal of psychotraumatology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan I BissonInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inconsistent implementation of evidence-based practice has become a significant concern in the traumatic stress field. The European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS) has played a major role in highlighting this issue and has contributed to a number of European initiatives to improve dissemination and implementation. Key initiatives include the introduction of the ESTSS General Certificate in Psychotrauma Psychotraumatology and the European Network for Traumatic Stress (TENTS); these are discussed in this paper.

Indexed as

disseminationevidence-basedimplementationPTSDtrauma

Identifiers

PMID23755325
PMCPMC3676530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.