Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23755177›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Distinct transcriptional networks in quiescent myoblasts: a role for Wnt signaling in reversible vs. irreversible arrest.

Sindhu Subramaniam, Prethish Sreenivas, Sirisha Cheedipudi, Vatrapu Rami Reddy, Lingadahalli Subrahmanya Shashidhara, Ravi Kumar Chilukoti, Madhavi Mylavarapu, Jyotsna Dhawan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The dynamics of centromere assembly and disassembly during quiescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Enhanced secretion of promyogenic exosomes by quiescent muscle cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sindhu SubramaniamCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India.
Prethish Sreenivas
Sirisha Cheedipudi
Vatrapu Rami Reddy
Lingadahalli Subrahmanya Shashidhara
Ravi Kumar Chilukoti
Madhavi Mylavarapu
Jyotsna Dhawan

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cells in adult mammals are non-dividing: differentiated cells exit the cell cycle permanently, but stem cells exist in a state of reversible arrest called quiescence. In damaged skeletal muscle, quiescent satellite stem cells re-enter the cell cycle, proliferate and subsequently execute divergent programs to regenerate both post-mitotic myofibers and quiescent stem cells. The molecular basis for these alternative programs of arrest is poorly understood. In this study, we used an established myogenic culture model (C2C12 myoblasts) to generate cells in alternative states of arrest and investigate their global transcriptional profiles. Using cDNA microarrays, we compared G0 myoblasts with post-mitotic myotubes. Our findings define the transcriptional program of quiescent myoblasts in culture and establish that distinct gene expression profiles, especially of tumour suppressor genes and inhibitors of differentiation characterize reversible arrest, distinguishing this state from irreversibly arrested myotubes. We also reveal the existence of a tissue-specific quiescence program by comparing G0 C2C12 myoblasts to isogenic G0 fibroblasts (10T1/2). Intriguingly, in myoblasts but not fibroblasts, quiescence is associated with a signature of Wnt pathway genes. We provide evidence that different levels of signaling via the canonical Wnt pathway characterize distinct cellular states (proliferation vs. quiescence vs. differentiation). Moderate induction of Wnt signaling in quiescence is associated with critical properties such as clonogenic self-renewal. Exogenous Wnt treatment subverts the quiescence program and negatively affects clonogenicity. Finally, we identify two new quiescence-induced regulators of canonical Wnt signaling, Rgs2 and Dkk3, whose induction in G0 is required for clonogenic self-renewal. These results support the concept that active signal-mediated regulation of quiescence contributes to stem cell properties, and have implications for pathological states such as cancer and degenerative disease.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsbeta CateninCell Cycle CheckpointsCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ProliferationChromatin ImmunoprecipitationClone CellsFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiceModels, BiologicalMuscle Fibers, SkeletalAdaptor Proteins, Signal Transducingbeta CateninDkk3 protein, mouseIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsRgs2 protein, mouseRGS ProteinsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23755177
PMCPMC3670900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.