Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23754962›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

Enterococcus faecalis prophage dynamics and contributions to pathogenic traits.

Renata C Matos, Nicolas Lapaque, Lionel Rigottier-Gois, Laurent Debarbieux, Thierry Meylheuc, Bruno Gonzalez-Zorn, Francis Repoila, Maria de Fatima Lopes, Pascale Serror

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Prophage: agent provocateur?Archives of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Capsid redirection mechanism of thePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Genetics, ecology and evolution of phage satellites.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Identification and characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  13. Directed evolution of bacteriophages: thwarted by prolific prophage.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  15. Directed evolution of bacteriophages: impacts of prolific prophage.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The role of rhizosphere phages in soil health.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024
    Review
  18. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  19. CI:Mor interactions in the lysogeny switches ofMicrobiome research reports · 2024
    Article
  20. CRISPRpi: Inducing and Curing Prophage Using the CRISPR Interference.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Renata C MatosINRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Nicolas Lapaque
Lionel Rigottier-Gois
Laurent Debarbieux
Thierry Meylheuc
Bruno Gonzalez-Zorn
Francis Repoila
Maria de Fatima Lopes
Pascale Serror
AgroParisTech · FRMicrobiologie de l’alimentation au service de la santé · FRUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTInstitut Pasteur · FRUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polylysogeny is frequently considered to be the result of an adaptive evolutionary process in which prophages confer fitness and/or virulence factors, thus making them important for evolution of both bacterial populations and infectious diseases. The Enterococcus faecalis V583 isolate belongs to the high-risk clonal complex 2 that is particularly well adapted to the hospital environment. Its genome carries 7 prophage-like elements (V583-pp1 to -pp7), one of which is ubiquitous in the species. In this study, we investigated the activity of the V583 prophages and their contribution to E. faecalis biological traits. We systematically analyzed the ability of each prophage to excise from the bacterial chromosome, to replicate and to package its DNA. We also created a set of E. faecalis isogenic strains that lack from one to all six non-ubiquitous prophages by mimicking natural excision. Our work reveals that prophages of E. faecalis V583 excise from the bacterial chromosome in the presence of a fluoroquinolone, and are able to produce active phage progeny. Intricate interactions between V583 prophages were also unveiled: i) pp7, coined EfCIV583 for E. faecalis chromosomal island of V583, hijacks capsids from helper phage 1, leading to the formation of distinct virions, and ii) pp1, pp3 and pp5 inhibit excision of pp4 and pp6. The hijacking exerted by EfCIV583 on helper phage 1 capsids is the first example of molecular piracy in Gram positive bacteria other than staphylococci. Furthermore, prophages encoding platelet-binding-like proteins were found to be involved in adhesion to human platelets, considered as a first step towards the development of infective endocarditis. Our findings reveal not only a role of E. faecalis V583 prophages in pathogenicity, but also provide an explanation for the correlation between antibiotic usage and E. faecalis success as a nosocomial pathogen, as fluoriquinolone may provoke release of prophages and promote gene dissemination among isolates.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, BacterialCross InfectionEnterococcus faecalisGenome, BacterialHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansProphagesVirulence FactorsVirus ActivationVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID23754962
PMCPMC3675006
OpenAlexW2051836984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.