Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23754712›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2014

Age and sex differences in reward behavior in adolescent and adult rats.

Lindsey R Hammerslag, Joshua M Gulley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Using sign tracking to experimentally increase self-control in rats.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Social Defeat Stress Model for Adolescent C57BL/6 Male and Female Mice.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lindsey R HammerslagNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
Joshua M Gulley

Funding

Mechanisms of amphetamine-induced plasticity in adolescents compared to adultsR01DA029815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GULLEY, JOSHUA M · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to adults, adolescents are at heightened risk for drug abuse and dependence. One of the factors contributing to this vulnerability may be age-dependent differences in reward processing, with adolescents approaching reward through stimulus-directed, rather than goal-directed, processes. However, the empirical evidence for this in rodent models of adolescence, particularly those that investigate both sexes, is limited. To address this, male and female rats that were adolescents (P30) or adults (P98) at the start of the experiment were trained in a Pavlovian approach (PA) task and were subsequently tested for the effects of reward devaluation, extinction, and re-acquisition. We found significant interactions between age and sex: females had enhanced acquisition of PA and poorer extinction, relative to males, while adolescents and females were less sensitive to reward devaluation than male adults. These results suggest that females and adolescents exhibit reward behavior that is more stimulus-directed, rather than goal-directed.

Indexed as

RewardSex CharacteristicsAge FactorsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyadolescentextinctionlearningPavlovian approachratreacquisitionreward devaluationreward processingsex

Identifiers

PMID23754712
PMCPMC4782597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.