Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23754504›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2013

Clinical significance of IgA anti-cardiolipin and IgA anti-β2glycoprotein I antibodies.

Laura Andreoli, Micaela Fredi, Cecilia Nalli, Silvia Piantoni, Rossella Reggia, Francesca Dall'Ara, Franco Franceschini, Angela Tincani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura AndreoliRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy. box.lauraandreoli@libero.it
Micaela Fredi
Cecilia Nalli
Silvia Piantoni
Rossella Reggia
Francesca Dall'Ara
Franco Franceschini
Angela Tincani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IgA antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are not currently recognized as formal laboratory criteria for the Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). This is mainly due to methodological issues (different study designs, use of various non-standardized IgA assays). However, there are experimental data showing the pathogenic role of IgA anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and IgA anti-β2glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-β2GPI). Isolated IgA aCL are not very common, therefore their testing could be useful in the case of strong suspicion of APS but negative results for other aPL tests. IgA anti-β2GPI seem to be the most prevalent isotype in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), with a significant association with thrombotic events. Such a clinical relevance has been recently recognized by the inclusion of these autoantibodies among the aPL tests in the novel SLICC classification criteria for SLE. Emerging interest has been raised by IgA anti-β2GPI against domain 4/5 as a novel subgroup of clinically relevant aPL.

Indexed as

Antibodies, AnticardiolipinAntiphospholipid SyndromeAutoantibodiesbeta 2-Glycoprotein IBiomarkersHumansImmunoglobulin ALupus Erythematosus, SystemicAntibodies, AnticardiolipinAutoantibodiesbeta 2-Glycoprotein IBiomarkersImmunoglobulin A

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.