ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013
Random fluctuation of selection coefficients and the extent of nucleotide variation in human populations.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting Fluctuating Selection: A Unified Population and Quantitative Genetics Framework.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Adaptive tracking with antagonistic pleiotropy results in seemingly neutral molecular evolution.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Models of Fluctuating Selection Between Generations: A Solution for the Theoretical Inconsistency.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Article
- Predicting population genetic change in an autocorrelated random environment: Insights from a large automated experiment.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Balancing Selection Drives the Maintenance of Genetic Variation in Drosophila Antimicrobial Peptides.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Antiviral drug resistance as an adaptive process.Virus evolution · 2016Review
- Signatures of natural selection on genetic variants affecting complex human traits.Applied & translational genomics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well known that the selection coefficient of a mutant allele varies from generation to generation, and the effect of this factor on genetic variation has been studied by many theoreticians. However, no consensus has been reached. One group of investigators believes that fluctuating selection has an effect of enhancing genetic variation, whereas the other group contends that it has a diversity-reducing effect. In recent years, it has become possible to study this problem by using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as well as exome sequence data. In this article we present the theoretical distributions of mutant nucleotide frequencies for the two models of fluctuating selection and then compare the distributions with the empirical distributions obtained from SNP and exome sequence data in human populations. Interestingly, both SNP and exome sequence data showed that the neutral mutation model fits the empirical distribution quite well. Furthermore, the mathematical models with diversity-enhancing and diversity-reducing effects also fit the empirical distribution reasonably well. This result implies that there is no need of distinguishing between the diversity-enhancing and diversity-reducing models of fluctuating selection and the nucleotide polymorphism in human populations can be explained largely by neutral mutations when long-term evolution is considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.