ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013
Quantifying the topography of the intrinsic energy landscape of flexible biomolecular recognition.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of the Richards function to serum antibody titration.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Interplay between Stability and Flexibility in the Design of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Hydrolases.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Learning continuous potentials from smFRET.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Inferring potential landscapes from noisy trajectories of particles within an optical feedback trap.iScience · 2022Article
- Perspectives on the landscape and flux theory for describing emergent behaviors of the biological systems.Journal of biological physics · 2022Review
- Investigating the Conformational Dynamics of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase during Its Folding and Binding to DNA and a Nucleotide.JACS Au · 2022Article
- Molecular Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Their Binding Mechanisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Investigating the trade-off between folding and function in a multidomain Y-family DNA polymerase.eLife · 2020Article
- Conformational state switching and pathways of chromosome dynamics in cell cycle.Applied physics reviews · 2020Article
- Investigations of the underlying mechanisms of HIF-1α and CITED2 binding to TAZ1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Explicit Characterization of the Free Energy Landscape of pKID-KIX Coupled Folding and Binding.ACS central science · 2019Article
- Structure, stability and specificity of the binding of ssDNA and ssRNA with proteins.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Position-, disorder-, and salt-dependent diffusion in binding-coupled-folding of intrinsically disordered proteins.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2019Article
- Efficient flexible backbone protein-protein docking for challenging targets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Quantifying the Intrinsic Conformation Energy Landscape Topography of Proteins with Large-Scale Open-Closed Transition.ACS central science · 2018Article
- SPA-LN: a scoring function of ligand-nucleic acid interactions via optimizing both specificity and affinity.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Molecular mechanism of multispecific recognition of Calmodulin through conformational changes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Opposing Intermolecular Tuning of CaBiophysical journal · 2017Article
- Electrostatic forces govern the binding mechanism of intrinsically disordered histone chaperones.PloS one · 2017Article
- Conformation Dynamics of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein c-Myb with theRSC advances · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomolecular functions are determined by their interactions with other molecules. Biomolecular recognition is often flexible and associated with large conformational changes involving both binding and folding. However, the global and physical understanding for the process is still challenging. Here, we quantified the intrinsic energy landscapes of flexible biomolecular recognition in terms of binding-folding dynamics for 15 homodimers by exploring the underlying density of states, using a structure-based model both with and without considering energetic roughness. By quantifying three individual effective intrinsic energy landscapes (one for interfacial binding, two for monomeric folding), the association mechanisms for flexible recognition of 15 homodimers can be classified into two-state cooperative "coupled binding-folding" and three-state noncooperative "folding prior to binding" scenarios. We found that the association mechanism of flexible biomolecular recognition relies on the interplay between the underlying effective intrinsic binding and folding energy landscapes. By quantifying the whole global intrinsic binding-folding energy landscapes, we found strong correlations between the landscape topography measure Λ (dimensionless ratio of energy gap versus roughness modulated by the configurational entropy) and the ratio of the thermodynamic stable temperature versus trapping temperature, as well as between Λ and binding kinetics. Therefore, the global energy landscape topography determines the binding-folding thermodynamics and kinetics, crucial for the feasibility and efficiency of realizing biomolecular function. We also found "U-shape" temperature-dependent kinetic behavior and a dynamical cross-over temperature for dividing exponential and nonexponential kinetics for two-state homodimers. Our study provides a unique way to bridge the gap between theory and experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.