Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23752995›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2013

Ex vivo culture of human prostate tissue and drug development.

Margaret M Centenera, Ganesh V Raj, Karen E Knudsen, Wayne D Tilley, Lisa M Butler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Protein disulfide isomerases regulate androgen receptor stability and promote prostate cancer cell growth and survival.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Advancements in 3D In Vitro Models for Colorectal Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. An efficient injection protocol forBiology methods & protocols · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Making In Vitro Tumor Models Whole Again.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margaret M CenteneraDame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories and Adelaide Prostate Cancer Research Centre, University of Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Ganesh V Raj
Karen E Knudsen
Wayne D Tilley
Lisa M Butler

Funding

Therapeutic agents targeting nuclear receptor signaling in distinct molecular subtypes of breast cancerR01CA223828 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI RAJ, GANESH V, VADLAMUDI, RATNA K · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Cyclin D1: repercussions of AR control and alternative splicing in prostate canceR01CA099996 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2003 to 2013
$2.6M
Endocrine disruptors: AR regulation and prostate cancerR01ES016675 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
Role of BAF57 in AR control and prostate cancer growthR01CA116777 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099996-09NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116777-05NCI NIH HHS R01 CA223828NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016675-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although an array of new therapeutics exist for prostate cancer, the development of agents that can improve outcomes for men with prostate cancer remains inefficient, costly, and frustratingly slow. A major impediment to the clinical translation of research findings is the lack of preclinical models that can accurately predict the clinical efficacy of new drugs and, therefore, enable the selection of agents that are most suitable for clinical trials. An approach that is gaining popularity in the prostate cancer community is ex vivo culture of primary human tissues, which retains the native tissue architecture, hormone responsiveness, and cell-to-cell signalling of the tumour microenvironment in a dynamic and manipulable state. Ex vivo culture systems recapitulate the structural complexity and heterogeneity of human prostate cancers in a laboratory setting, making them an important adjunct to current cell-line-based and animal-based models. When incorporated into preclinical studies, ex vivo cultured tissues enable robust quantitative evaluation of clinically relevant end points representing drug efficacy, investigation of therapy resistance, and biomarker discovery. By providing new clinically relevant insights into prostate carcinogenesis, it is likely that ex vivo culture will enhance drug development programmes and improve the translational 'hit rate' for prostate cancer research.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug DiscoveryDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMaleProstateProstatic NeoplasmsTumor Cells, CulturedTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.