Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23752794›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2013

Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis.

Z Jeffrey Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 267 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
267citing papers in PubMed
25.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

267 citing papers in PubMed, 564 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Diurnal dynamics of maize gene expression is associated with phyllosphere microbiome composition.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association mapping of hybrid seed set and heterosis in a central European multi-parental wheat population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

207 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Z Jeffrey ChenInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Biology and Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. zjchen@austin.utexas.edu
Nanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Genome DuplicationR01GM067015 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI CHEN, ZENGJIAN JEFFREY · 2003 to 2009
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM067015NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067015PHS HHS 07161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterosis, also known as hybrid vigour, is widespread in plants and animals, but the molecular bases for this phenomenon remain elusive. Recent studies in hybrids and allopolyploids using transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, epigenomic and systems biology approaches have provided new insights. Emerging genomic and epigenetic perspectives suggest that heterosis arises from allelic interactions between parental genomes, leading to altered programming of genes that promote the growth, stress tolerance and fitness of hybrids. For example, epigenetic modifications of key regulatory genes in hybrids and allopolyploids can alter complex regulatory networks of physiology and metabolism, thus modulating biomass and leading to heterosis. The conceptual advances could help to improve plant and animal productivity through the manipulation of heterosis.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGenes, PlantGenomicsAllelesBiomassGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyHybrid VigorMetabolomicsModels, GeneticPlant Physiological PhenomenaPloidiesPolyploidySystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID23752794
OpenAlexW2122560513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.