Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23752710›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2013

Antihypertensive drug class interactions and risk for incident diabetes: a nested case-control study.

Rhonda M Cooper--DeHoff, Steven T Bird, Gregory A Nichols, Joseph A Delaney, Almut G Winterstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rhonda M Cooper--DeHoffDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. dehoff@cop.ufl.edu
Steven T Bird
Gregory A Nichols
Joseph A Delaney
Almut G Winterstein
University of Florida · USFlorida College · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive ResponsesU01GM074492 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI JOHNSON, JULIE A. · 2005 to 2014
$20.7M
Metabolic Effects of Antihypertensive DrugsK23HL086558 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI COOPER-DEHOFF, RHONDA M · 2007 to 2011
$672k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL086558NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL086558NIGMS NIH HHS 2U01 GM074492NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM074492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to determine how single and combination antihypertensive therapy alters risk for diabetes mellitus (DM).Thiazide diuretics (TD), β blockers (BB), and renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASB) impact DM risk while calcium channel blockers (CCB) are neutral. DM risk associated with combinations is unclear. METHODS AND

resultsWe enrolled nondiabetic patients from Kaiser Permanente Northwest with a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <126 mg/dL between 1997 and 2010. DM cases were defined by a FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL, random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL, HbA1c ≥ 7.0%, or new DM prescription (index date). We used incidence density sampling to match 10 controls per case on the date of follow-up glucose test (to reduce detection bias), in addition to age and date of cohort entry. Exposure to antihypertensive class was assessed during the 30 days prior to index date. Our cohort contained 134 967 patients and had 412 604 glucose tests eligible for matching. A total of 9097 DM cases were matched to 90 495 controls (median age 51 years). Exposure to TD (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.68) or BB (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.28) was associated with an increased DM risk, while CCB and RASB exposure was not. TD+BB combination resulted in the fully combined diabetogenic risk of both agents (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.80 to 2.20; interaction OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.22). In contrast, combination of RASB with either TD or BB showed significant negative interactions, resulting in a smaller DM risk than TD or BB monotherapy.

conclusionsDiabetogenic potential of combination therapy should be considered when prescribing antihypertensive therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCase-Control StudiesDiabetes MellitusDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAntihypertensive Agentsdiabetesdiabetogenicdrug interactionshypertensionRAS blockersthiazide diureticsβ blockers

Identifiers

PMID23752710
PMCPMC3698771
OpenAlexW2136524670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.