Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23752269›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2013

Network quantification of EGFR signaling unveils potential for targeted combination therapy.

Bertram Klinger, Anja Sieber, Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther, Franziska Witzel, Leanne Berry, Dirk Schumacher, Yibing Yan, Pawel Durek, Mark Merchant, Reinhold Schäfer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Himalayan flora: targeting various molecular pathways in lung cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Critical transition and reversion of tumorigenesis.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Network inference from perturbation time course data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bertram KlingerLaboratory of Molecular Tumour Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anja Sieber
Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther
Franziska Witzel
Leanne Berry
Dirk Schumacher
Yibing Yan
Pawel Durek
Mark Merchant
Reinhold Schäfer
Christine Sers
Nils Blüthgen
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGenesys (United States) · USBiomarker Technologies (China) · CNHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling network is activated in most solid tumors, and small-molecule drugs targeting this network are increasingly available. However, often only specific combinations of inhibitors are effective. Therefore, the prediction of potent combinatorial treatments is a major challenge in targeted cancer therapy. In this study, we demonstrate how a model-based evaluation of signaling data can assist in finding the most suitable treatment combination. We generated a perturbation data set by monitoring the response of RAS/PI3K signaling to combined stimulations and inhibitions in a panel of colorectal cancer cell lines, which we analyzed using mathematical models. We detected that a negative feedback involving EGFR mediates strong cross talk from ERK to AKT. Consequently, when inhibiting MAPK, AKT activity is increased in an EGFR-dependent manner. Using the model, we predict that in contrast to single inhibition, combined inactivation of MEK and EGFR could inactivate both endpoints of RAS, ERK and AKT. We further could demonstrate that this combination blocked cell growth in BRAF- as well as KRAS-mutated tumor cells, which we confirmed using a xenograft model.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorDrug Therapy, CombinationErbB ReceptorsExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceMice, NudePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein Interaction MapsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBRAF protein, humanEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23752269
PMCPMC3964313
OpenAlexW2136760727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.