ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2013
A logic model for community engagement within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards consortium: can we measure what we model?
Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and translational science award hubs in learning health systems: development of the engine-drivetrain model.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Community feedback sessions: An adaptation of the community engagement studio model to enhance scalability.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: Recommendations for Sustainable Research Partnerships Between Community Health and Academic Health Centers.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2026Article
- An innovative and comprehensive approach to community health and research engagement using the Social Ecological Model.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Institutional transformations for authentic community engaged and participatory research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Measuring the strength of primary care: development of a new system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care - SiSPC.Primary health care research & development · 2025Article
- The development, validity, and reliability of the Researcher Investment Tool.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Building a diverse national research advisory board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Approaches and tools to measure individual-level research experience, activities, and outcomes: A narrative review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Review
- 2021 Community Engagement Studio Virtual Training Summit: Increasing the Diversity of Stakeholders Engaged in Research.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2024Article
- Consensus Building to Inform Common Evaluation Metrics for the Comprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Population Health Improvement Awards: Supporting Community and Academic Capacity to Partner in Research and Improve Population Health.Journal of community engagement and scholarship · 2023Article
- Aligning clinical research ethics with community-engaged and participatory research in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- A Logic Model Framework for Planning an International Refugee Health Research, Evaluation, and Ethics Committee.Health promotion practice · 2022Article
- Evaluating the Impacts of Patient Engagement on Health Services Research Teams: Lessons from the Veteran Consulting Network.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Exploring Corporate Stakeholders' Perspectives on Building Capacity for Employee Engagement in Workplace Wellness Initiatives.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Collaboration and Context in the Design of Community-Engaged Research Training.Health promotion practice · 2021Article
- Community engagement in the prevention and control of COVID-19: Insights from Vietnam.PloS one · 2021Article
- A compendium of community engagement responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) initiative calls on academic health centers to engage communities around a clinical research relationship measured ultimately in terms of public health. Among a few initiatives involving university accountability for advancing public interests, a small CTSA workgroup devised a community engagement (CE) logic model that organizes common activities within a university-community infrastructure to facilitate CE in research. Whereas the model focuses on the range of institutional CE inputs, it purposefully does not include an approach for assessing how CE influences research implementation and outcomes. Rather, with communities and individuals beginning to transition into new research roles, this article emphasizes studying CE through specific relationship types and assessing how expanded research teams contribute to the full spectrum of translational science.The authors propose a typology consisting of three relationship types-engagement, collaboration, and shared leadership-to provide a foundation for investigating community-academic contributions to the new CTSA research paradigm. The typology shifts attention from specific community-academic activities and, instead, encourages analyses focused on measuring the strength of relationships through variables like synergy and trust. The collaborative study of CE relationships will inform an understanding of CTSA infrastructure development in support of translational research and its goal, which is expressed in the logic model: better science, better answers, better population health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.