ArticleClinical and translational science2013
A novel program trains community-academic teams to build research and partnership capacity.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small CBPR Grants Program: An Innovative Model to Build Sustainable Academic-Community Partnerships.Metropolitan universities · 2023Article
- The Architecture of an Internal, Scientific, Presubmission Review Program Designed to Increase the Impact and Success of Grant Proposals and Manuscripts.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2020Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Training Program for Community-Based Participatory Research in Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Enhancing translational researchers' ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- Creating a Culture of Empowerment in Research: Findings from a Capacity-Building Training Program.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2016Article
- A Community-Academic Partnered Grant Writing Series to Build Infrastructure for Partnered Research.Clinical and translational science · 2015Article
- Strengthening community involvement in grant review: insights from the Community-University Research Partnership (CURES) pilot review process.Clinical and translational science · 2014Article
- Journal clubs: an educational approach to advance understanding among community partners and academic researchers about CBPR and cancer health disparities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Community-Engaged Research Team Support (CERTS) program was developed and tested to build research and partnership capacity for community-engaged research (CEnR) teams. Led by the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NUCATS), the goals of CERTS were: (1) to help community-academic teams build capacity for conducting rigorous CEnR and (2) to support teams as they prepare federal grant proposal drafts. The program was guided by an advisory committee of community and clinical partners, and representatives from Chicago's Clinical and Translational Science Institutes. Monthly workshops guided teams to write elements of NIH-style research proposals. Draft reviewing fostered a collaborative learning environment and helped teams develop equal partnerships. The program culminated in a mock-proposal review. All teams clarified their research and acquired new knowledge about the preparation of NIH-style proposals. Trust, partnership collaboration, and a structured writing strategy were assets of the CERTS approach. CERTS also uncovered gaps in resources and preparedness for teams to be competitive for federally funded grants. Areas of need include experience as principal investigators, publications on study results, mentoring, institutional infrastructure, and dedicated time for research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.