Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23750319›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials science2013

Comparative study of guanidine-based and lysine-based brush copolymers for plasmid delivery.

Peter M Carlson, Joan G Schellinger, Joshuel A Pahang, Russell N Johnson, Suzie H Pun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Polyplex transfection from intracerebroventricular delivery is not significantly affected by traumatic brain injury.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Self-assembled PEG-Regenerative biomaterials · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Multivalent display of pendant pro-apoptotic peptides increases cytotoxic activity.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter M CarlsonUniversity of Washington Department of Bioengineering and Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute William H. Foege Building, Box 355061 3720 15 Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98195.
Joan G Schellinger
Joshuel A Pahang
Russell N Johnson
Suzie H Pun
University of Washington · US

Funding

Ultrasound-aided gene transfer to direct cortical neurogenesis after brain injuryR01NS064404 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HORNER, PHILIP J, PUN, SUZIE H. · 2009 to 2018
$3.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyethylenimine (PEI), one of the most frequently used polycations for non-viral nucleic acid delivery, exhibits good transfection efficiency to cultured cells but generally has to be used in restricted concentration ranges due to high cytotoxicity. We recently reported a family of HPMA-co-oligolysine brush copolymers that show nucleic acid delivery efficiencies approaching that of PEI. Guanidine-containing polymers have been reported in some systems to be more effective at cellular delivery of cargo than their primary-amine analogs. The goal of this work is to investigate the effect of guanidinylation on gene transfer ability of HPMA-co-oligolysine copolymers. Several parameters were evaluated: arginine versus homoarginine monomers, oligopeptide length, and charge density within the peptide. Using reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, a series of six copolymers were synthesized containing the cationic peptides K

Identifiers

PMID23750319
PMCPMC3673726
OpenAlexW2023630138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.