Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23750042›Full record

ArticleChemical physics letters2008

Quantifying accumulation or exclusion of H

L M Pegram, M T Record

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical physics letters, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Elastin recoil is driven by the hydrophobic effect.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Thermodynamics of Anion Complexation to Nonpolar Pockets.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2018
    Article
  6. Adduct Formation in ESI/MS by Mobile Phase Additives.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Anion complexation and the Hofmeister effect.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brønsted basicity of the air-water interface.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Why Hofmeister effects of many salts favor protein folding but not DNA helix formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The inverse and direct Hofmeister series for lysozyme.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L M PegramDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
M T Record

Funding

THERMODYNAMIC AND NMR STUDIES ON THE E COLI CYTOPLASMR01GM047022 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RECORD, M. THOMAS · 1992 to 2015
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, surface spectroscopies and simulations have begun to characterize the non-uniform distributions of salt ions near macroscopic and molecular surfaces. The thermodynamic consequences of these non-uniform distributions determine the often-large ion-specific effects of Hofmeister salts on a very wide range of processes in water. For uncharged surfaces, where these nonuniform ion distributions are confined to the first few layers of water at the surface, a two-state approximation to the distributions of water and ions, called the salt ion partitioning model (SPM) has both molecular and thermodynamic signiicance. Here, we summarize SPM results quantifying the local accumulation of H

Identifiers

PMID23750042
PMCPMC3673785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.