Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23749488›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2013

GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphism and susceptibility to esophageal cancer in high- and low-risk regions of India.

Anita Sharma, Bhudev Chander Das, Ashok Sehgal, Ravi Mehrotra, Premashish Kar, Sarita Sardana, Rup Phukan, Jagdish Mahanta, Joydeep Purkayastha, Sunita Saxena and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interaction betweenResearch in autism spectrum disorders · 2015
    Article
  7. Association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a case-control study in Kashmir, India.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  8. Association of p53 expression with prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Anita SharmaDivision of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology (ICMR), I-7, Sector 39, Noida, 201301, India.
Bhudev Chander Das
Ashok Sehgal
Ravi Mehrotra
Premashish Kar
Sarita Sardana
Rup Phukan
Jagdish Mahanta
Joydeep Purkayastha
Sunita Saxena
Sujala Kapur
Indranil Chatterjee
Joginder Kumar Sharma
Indian Council of Medical Research · INRegional Medical Research Centre · INSafdarjang Hospital · INBhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute · INMaulana Azad Medical College · INRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutathione transferases, a super family of dimeric phase II metabolic enzymes play a vital role in biotransformation of many substances. This study evaluates the influence of genetic polymorphism of GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene loci on esophageal cancer risk in Assam and Delhi from India. DNA from blood samples of esophageal cancer cases (203,112) and controls (286,150) from Assam and Delhi, respectively, were extracted. GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms were analyzed by multiplex PCR procedure. Differences in proportions were tested using Pearson's chi-square test with odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). Risk of esophageal cancer was approximately twice in individuals having homozygous GSTM1 (OR-2.1, 95 % CI, 1.44-3.13) and GSTT1 null genotypes (OR-1.7,95 % CI, 0.99-2.77) in Assam, and around three times in GSTT1 null genotype (OR-2.9, 95 % CI, 1.56-5.27) in Delhi population. GSTM1 null genotype seems to play a protective role (OR-0.7, 95 % CI, 0.39-1.27) in Delhi. A significant association of GSTM1 null genotype with esophageal cancer was observed in a younger age group in Assam (OR-2.7, 95 % CI, 1.48-5.01), and in Delhi population association was observed in smokers with GSTT1 null genotype (OR-2.5, 95 % CI, 1.04-6.07), and alcoholics having GSTM1 null genotype (OR-2.6, 95 % CI, 0.99-6.77). Significant association of GSTM1 null genotype in Assam was observed between cancer cases and controls in fermented betel nut chewers only (OR-2.8, 95 % CI, 1.19-6.72), whereas, smoking and alcohol failed to show any correlation with GSTM1/GSTT1 genotypes. Cancer development is not only due to exogenous or endogenous carcinogens but depends on their interaction with genes that are involved in the detoxification of these carcinogens.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlcohol DrinkingCarcinoma, Squamous CellCase-Control StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeGlutathione TransferaseHumansIndiaglutathione S-transferase T1Glutathione Transferase

Identifiers

PMID23749488
OpenAlexW2015104989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.