Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23749486›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2013

Association between the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and lung cancer risk in the Asian population.

Xin Tian, Ye Tian, Ping Ma, Chengguang Sui, Fandong Meng, Yan Li, Liye Fu, Tao Jiang, Yang Wang, Youhong Jiang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantitative assessment of the associations between DNA repair gene XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and gastric cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xin TianMolecular Oncology Department of Cancer Research Institution, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Ye Tian
Ping Ma
Chengguang Sui
Fandong Meng
Yan Li
Liye Fu
Tao Jiang
Yang Wang
Youhong Jiang
China Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CNFourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) plays a vital role in maintaining the stability of genome by homologous recombination repair for DNA double-strand breaks. The genetic polymorphism of XRCC3 C241T has been implicated in lung cancer risk, but the findings across published studies in Asians are inconsistent and inconclusive. To estimate the precise association of XRCC3 C241T polymorphism with lung cancer risk, a meta-analysis of all currently available studies in Asians was performed. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was conducted for eligible studies based on the inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association. Besides, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were also performed for further estimation. Seven available studies with a total of 7,398 subjects were finally included into this meta-analysis. The overall ORs indicated that the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism was not associated with a lung cancer risk among Asians in all genetic contrast modes (ORT allele vs. C allele = 1.08, 95 % CI 0.95-1.24, P OR = 0.252; ORTT vs. CC = 1.30, 95 % CI 0.69-2.45, P OR = 0.426; ORCT vs. CC = 1.07, 95 % CI 0.93-1.24, P OR = 0.363; ORTT + CT vs. CC = 1.08, 95 % CI 0.94-1.24, P OR = 0.300; ORTT vs. CC + CT = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.68-2.43, P OR = 0.439). We failed to identify significant association between the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and risk of lung cancer in Chinese and population-based studies. Interestingly, the pooled ORs in hospital-based studies indicated that the XRCC3 C241T variant carriers were more susceptible to lung cancer (ORT allele vs. C allele = 1.27, 95 % CI 1.04-1.56, P OR = 0.019; ORCT vs. CC = 1.26, 95 % CI 1.01-1.57, P OR = 0.045; ORTT + CT vs. CC = 1.28, 95 % CI 1.03-1.59, P OR = 0.027). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability and liability of all results. This meta-analysis suggests that the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism may not exert a risk effect on the lung cancer risk in Asians, although a statistically significant association was observed among the hospital-based studies. Thus, the precise relationship between the XRCC3 C241T variant and lung cancer risk needs further confirmation in future studies with large available data.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAsian PeopleCase-Control StudiesDNA-Binding ProteinsGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansLung NeoplasmsOdds RatioRisk FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsX-ray repair cross complementing protein 3

Identifiers

PMID23749486
OpenAlexW2060894754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.